Job intelligence
Associate Director, Instructional Impact
College Board
Executive opportunity brief
The decision in one screen
A compact evidence-first read of compensation, flexibility, mobility and what still needs verification. No universal quality score is used.
Fast read
Opportunity DNA
The role stands out because location flexibility looks unusually broad. Before going further, confirm whether a degree is actually required, preferred, or replaceable with equivalent experience.
Current comparable position is around the 7th percentile.
No material geography, office-attendance or timezone restriction is visible in the available wording.
Some access and qualification signals are clear, but the overall entry path is neither unusually open nor unusually restrictive.
Sponsorship and relocation support are not clear from the current listing.
Part of the application route can be assessed, but the full external process may contain additional steps.
At least one recent enabled source can still renew this vacancy.
This fingerprint summarizes what is clear, constrained or still unanswered in the current listing. It is a reading aid, not an overall job score.
Decision evidence check
5 of 5 core facts stated
This checks whether the listing states the facts that commonly change an employment decision. It measures disclosure completeness, not whether the opportunity is good or bad.
Facts already stated
- Compensation
- Work arrangement
- Advertised location
- Application closing time
- Employment type
Core evidence complete
All five core facts are stated. Other details can still matter, so continue with the qualification, mobility, employer and application checks below.
Advertised location is not proof of work authorization, sponsorship, or legal eligibility. Unknown information is not a negative score; verify those questions separately.
Decision levers
What could make or break the fit?
Reasons to look closer
- Location flexibility looks unusually broad: The available wording supports high Remote Freedom without a material geography, office-attendance or timezone restriction showing up.
Trade-offs to weigh
No major trade-off is stated clearly in the information available here. Employment terms outside the listing may still matter.
Questions worth asking before you invest more time
- Confirm whether a degree is actually required, preferred, or replaceable with equivalent experience.
- Ask whether visa sponsorship is available before investing significant time in the application.
These questions come from details the listing leaves open. An unanswered point is not treated as a disadvantage.
Opportunity neighborhood
Keep your options open
These live roles sit close enough to this opportunity to make useful comparison points. Look across several employers before deciding what pay, flexibility or access trade-offs you are willing to accept.
Chief of Staff to the CEO
Mozilla · Canada, Germany, UK, USA
Why it is nearby: Same seniority band · Similar work arrangement · Same employment type
About 272% higher advertised midpoint
Strategic Alliance Director
Socure · USA
Why it is nearby: Same seniority band · Similar work arrangement · Same employment type
About 135% higher advertised midpoint
Associate Director, Paid Search B2B
Wpromote · USA
Why it is nearby: Same seniority band · Similar work arrangement · Same employment type
About 42% higher advertised midpoint
Global Director - General Ledger
CAI · USA
Why it is nearby: Same seniority band · Similar work arrangement · Same employment type
About 82% higher advertised midpoint
This neighborhood is drawn from current inventory in the same broad occupation. Similarity is based on explicit listing facts; missing details do not count against a job.
Role market context
How much current choice is visible around this kind of work?
This compares the vacancy with current High Paid Job inventory in the broad Executive leadership roles family. It describes visible choice and disclosure, not future demand or career quality.
200 most recent current roles sampled for the disclosure measures below.
Distinct employers in the bounded current sample, not an estimate of all employers hiring in the market.
Current sampled roles stating at least four of the five Core Decision Facts.
Requires a numeric amount, explicit ISO currency and supported pay period.
Listings with explicit enough remote, hybrid or on-site evidence to classify.
Missing deadline evidence remains unknown and is not interpreted as an open-ended application window.
Currencies with explicit pay evidence in the sample: USD (69) · EUR (4) · CAD (1) · CHF (1). Raw amounts across different currencies are not compared.
This describes current visible High Paid Job inventory in the same broad occupation family. Percentages use a bounded recent sample and are not a forecast, a complete labor-market census or an employer-quality measure.
Constraint opportunity lab
What changes the size of the current opportunity pool?
Each line applies one stricter evidence-based constraint to the same bounded current role-family sample. It helps you see the trade-off in visible choice without deciding which trade-off is right for you.
Counts only affirmative or possible sponsorship evidence, or relocation explicitly offered. Unknown is not treated as no.
A much stricter subset: only listings with explicit worldwide-remote evidence remain.
Counts roles explicitly classified as worldwide remote, region-restricted remote or remote with restrictions still unclear.
Shows the subset with enough stated evidence for a more informed first comparison.
Requires amount, explicit ISO currency and a supported pay period. Missing pay evidence remains unknown.
Uses only roles with a stated employment type.
Only same-currency opportunities with usable annualized pay enter this comparison. Other currencies are not converted or treated as lower.
Includes roles whose seniority is genuinely unspecified rather than assuming they belong to another level.
These are counterfactual filters over a bounded sample of current HPJ inventory in the same broad occupation family. They show how visible choice changes when one evidence-based constraint is applied; they do not tell you which constraint you should choose or predict hiring outcomes. The calculation uses the 200 most recent current roles from 1790 visible roles in this broad family.
Salary transparency context
Is pay disclosure typical for this kind of role?
This listing states usable structured compensation. About 38% of the bounded current role sample does the same.
Compensation counts only when amount, ISO currency and supported pay period are all known.
Pay disclosure is limited in the current role sample.
This employer’s current visible listings disclose pay materially more often than the current same-role sample.
This compares salary-disclosure behavior in current visible listings. It does not compare raw salary amounts across currencies, infer undisclosed pay as zero, or rate employer quality.
Private offer & negotiation lab
Turn an offer into evidence, not guesswork
Enter an annual base offer and, if you want, your own target. HPJ compares only within one explicit currency and never chooses a target for you.
Negotiation evidence available: advertised pay range, current same-currency market context, strong decision evidence.
Enter an annual base offer to compare it with explicit same-currency evidence. HPJ will not suggest a target for you.
Review the full package · 10 terms
Mark what is confirmed, what needs clarification and what you want to prioritize. These choices and notes stay in this browser.
Usable advertised compensation is available.
Variable compensation is mentioned; verify amount, formula, target and eligibility.
Equity or long-term incentive language is mentioned; verify grant type, vesting and valuation basis.
Retirement or pension benefits are mentioned; verify employer contribution and vesting.
Health-benefit language is mentioned; verify coverage, dependants and employee cost.
Paid-leave language is mentioned; verify the exact entitlement and carry-over rules.
A work-arrangement signal is available; verify schedule details before relying on it.
Relocation support not established
Sponsorship not established
A review cycle is mentioned; verify timing and whether compensation can change at that review.
Questions worth taking into the offer conversation
- Is there a bonus, commission or other variable-pay component, and how is it calculated?
- What retirement or pension contribution does the employer provide?
- What health coverage is included and what costs remain with the employee?
- How much paid leave is provided and what are the carry-over or blackout rules?
- If relocation is relevant, what expenses, timing and repayment conditions are covered?
- What exact sponsorship or work-authorization conditions apply to this role?
- When is the first performance and compensation review after joining?
Occupation intelligence
What broader career references connect to this role?
HPJ uses broad comparison families for current-market analysis. External taxonomy results are reference candidates for that broad family, not a declaration that this vacancy has been authoritatively classified into a specific occupation.
European occupation references
- chief operating officer
- brokerage firm director
- chief executive officer
- gambling manager
- animal facility manager
This service uses the ESCO classification of the European Commission.
U.S. occupation references
- Chief Executives 11-1011.00
- Chief Sustainability Officers 11-1011.03
- Fashion Designers 27-1022.00
- General and Operations Managers 11-1021.00
- Sales Managers 11-2022.00
This site incorporates information from O*NET Web Services by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA.
Career reference research
Skills worth investigating
Official occupational context, paired with exact phrases visible in this vacancy. It is not a skills test or an applicant-fit score.
ESCO · European occupation
chief operating officer
Usually essential in this ESCO occupation
- establish collaborative relations
- marketing management
- make strategic business decisions
- financial statements
- ensure lawful business operations
- integrate strategic foundation in daily performance
- track key performance indicators
Context-dependent ESCO skills
- financial management
- implement operational business plans
- apply import strategies
- assume responsibility for the management of a business
- analyse financial performance of a company
O*NET · U.S. occupation
Chief Executives
O*NET occupation skills
- Judgment and Decision Making
- Complex Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Coordination
- Management of Financial Resources
- Management of Personnel Resources
- Speaking
- Systems Evaluation
Build my private skill preparation brief Your evidence · Practice · Interview questions
Plan how you might demonstrate or investigate occupational skills. These are broad-family reference examples, not confirmed vacancy requirements. Nothing you enter is sent to High Paid Job.
Private to this browser. Up to 20 reference skills; not a qualification assessment or hiring prediction.
Useful next question: Which of these occupational reference skills does the hiring manager actually expect for this specific role, and what evidence would demonstrate them?
These skills belong to one reference occupation selected for HPJ’s broad career family, not a verified classification of this vacancy. Text overlap only means a phrase appears in the available listing text; it does not establish an employer requirement, your proficiency, or a qualification gap. A missing mention is unknown, not a deficit.
Skill bridge
What does this role connect to?
Project Management is one of the signals this listing shares with skills appearing often across current Executive leadership roles opportunities.
Skills named in this listing
Shared with the current career sample
- Project Management Seen in 11 sampled listings
Additional signals in this listing: JavaScript
Application edge
- If these skills match your background, prepare one concrete example that shows how you used JavaScript and Project Management rather than relying on a keyword-only claim.
- The listing mentions extra application steps. Review those requirements before starting so you can prepare the requested material in one pass.
Skill signals come from explicit text mentions. A mention is not automatically a requirement, and absence from the current top-skill list does not make a skill rare or unimportant. The current career comparison draws on 120 sampled listings; 76 contain a recognized skill signal.
Application Decision Lab
Turn the listing into a preparation plan
Separate what the listing actually states from what you still need to prepare or verify. Your selections and short notes stay in this browser and are never submitted to High Paid Job.
About 5 years of experience preferred
This is preference evidence, not a mandatory minimum. Prepare examples that demonstrate comparable responsibility rather than assuming the stated number is an automatic rejection threshold.
JavaScript
This skill or technology is explicitly mentioned in the available listing text. A mention is not automatically a mandatory requirement; prepare a concrete example only if it is relevant to your experience.
Project Management
This skill or technology is explicitly mentioned in the available listing text. A mention is not automatically a mandatory requirement; prepare a concrete example only if it is relevant to your experience.
Prepare for a stated application step
An assessment, test or work-sample step is explicitly mentioned.
Questions worth resolving before you rely on the opportunity
- Work authorization / sponsorship: If sponsorship or work authorization matters to you, what exact immigration or employer-sponsorship conditions apply to this role?
Decision analysis
What the listing really tells you
A closer look at Associate Director, Instructional Impact at College Board points most strongly to compensation has enough depth for comparison, the location rules are clear enough to judge, and the listing gives useful clues about who can realistically enter. Those signals shape the practical upside and the questions still worth asking.
Compensation has enough depth for comparison
Among 486 current comparable salaries in USD, the normalized annual midpoint is around the 7th percentile. This compares advertised pay in the same currency and does not include every element of total compensation.
The location rules are clear enough to judge
The work-location pattern is “Highly location-flexible”, with Remote Freedom at 96/100.
The listing gives useful clues about who can realistically enter
About 5 years of experience preferred. Unstated education or experience requirements stay open rather than being assumed.
The visible application effort can be estimated
Provider-mediated application path · 1 visible process step. The external application may contain additional steps that are not visible from the listing itself.
The listing can be traced to a current source
The opportunity currently has 1 renewable source path across 1 source classes. Multiple independent paths can strengthen continuity, but they are not a substitute for checking the application destination.
How this analysis is assembled
This read combines the structured details currently available for pay, flexibility, qualifications, mobility, application effort and source continuity. Missing facts are left open for you to verify.
Analysis evidence coverage
How much analysis can the current evidence support?
Uses the explainable High Pay Score within the job’s current occupation/seniority/currency comparison sample.
Measures observable location flexibility and explicit restrictions; it does not determine whether remote work is personally desirable.
The salary is source-provided and normalizable, but the advertised range is broad enough to reduce comparison precision.
The listing was posted about 19 days ago. Verify that it is still accepting applications.
At least one enabled source recently observed the vacancy. The source chain is traceable, but this is not independent employer verification.
There is no universal opportunity score because pay, flexibility and access matter differently to different people. Compare Jobs lets you weight the evidence around your own priorities.
Decision checklist
What is supported, uncertain or worth checking?
This checklist separates supported strengths, visible cautions and missing evidence. It is not an overall recommendation or guarantee that the job is suitable for you.
Supported strengths
- The available work-location evidence indicates strong location flexibility.
Visible cautions
- The listing was posted about 19 days ago. Verify that it is still accepting applications.
Still unknown
- Visa sponsorship is not established by the available listing data.
Pay vs. barriers
Pay and barrier context available
The current pay position can be viewed alongside the stated barriers, but the available detail does not support a stronger conclusion.
Comparable disclosed-pay evidence places this job at about 7 / 100 within its current occupation/seniority sample.
- Education requirement is not established.
This section weighs pay context against clearly stated barriers without collapsing unlike requirements into one universal score. Degree, experience, licensing, clearance and location limits remain separate, and missing qualification details stay unknown.
Beyond the headline
Not enough evidence for a hidden-value finding
Potential hidden value appears only when several distinct non-pay advantages are actually supported. Missing requirements or benefits are never counted as positives.
The observable Remote Freedom evidence is strong and contains few explicit restriction signals.
Still check: The current application path is provider-mediated rather than directly classified as an employer-authorized or official route.
Hidden Value is an experimental evidence summary, not an investment-style score or guarantee of employability. It only uses explicit current listing evidence and does not infer that an unmentioned qualification is unnecessary.
Compensation intelligence
How competitive is this pay?
Below many comparable disclosed salaries
The annualized midpoint is below the 25th percentile boundary of the current comparable sample.
The highlighted band is the middle 50% of the current comparable sample after the outlier guard. The dark marker is this job’s annualized salary midpoint.
Why this analysis?
- This score reflects the current advertised-pay distribution for comparable active jobs in the same currency. It measures pay position, not overall job quality.
- Salary confidence: Medium. The salary is source-provided and normalizable, but the advertised range is broad enough to reduce comparison precision.
- Range quality: Broad but usable range.
Employer compensation communication
Pay transparency at College Board
Very strong current pay transparency
This score uses the employer’s current visible listings and combines how often pay is disclosed with how useful those ranges are. Bonus, equity and benefit mentions are shown separately and do not raise the score.
This pattern comes from the employer’s current visible vacancies. It describes hiring and pay transparency in those listings, not employee satisfaction or a permanent judgement of the employer.
Current employer intelligence
College Board — current opportunity snapshot
Employer Evidence Profile
How often this employer’s current visible sampled vacancies state decision-critical information. These percentages describe evidence coverage, not employer quality.
Current sampled listings with advertised compensation evidence.
Current sampled listings whose work arrangement is clearer than unknown.
Current sampled listings with a supported country signal.
Current sampled listings with an explicit closing time.
Current sampled listings with a usable posting date.
Current sampled listings that explicitly indicate confirmed, possible or unavailable sponsorship evidence.
Current sampled listings with an explicit relocation signal.
Low coverage means the current visible listings state the information less often. It does not prove that the employer lacks the policy, benefit or support.
Common current occupation families: Executive (4)
Visible seniority mix: Leadership (4)
Current employment-type mix: Full time (4)
Other current roles from this employer
Associate Director, History and Social Science Sourcing
Remote — Worldwide
Leadership · Worldwide remoteSenior Engineering Director
Remote — Worldwide
Leadership · Worldwide remoteAssociate Director, AP Editorial Quality, STEM
Remote — Worldwide
Leadership · Worldwide remoteThese are other current vacancies visible from the same employer, not endorsements or evidence of future hiring plans.
There are not yet five current disclosed salaries in one currency, so an employer pay median would be too thin to be useful.
Questions worth asking this employer
- If work authorization matters to you, what sponsorship policy applies to this specific role and location?
- If a move is required, is relocation assistance available for this position?
These questions are prompted by missing or thin evidence in the employer’s current visible vacancies. Missing evidence is not treated as a negative judgement.
This employer snapshot uses the employer’s current visible listings. Remote and sponsorship rates use only vacancies with explicit evidence, while missing information stays unknown. Salary medians are shown separately by currency and need at least five disclosed salaries. Zero confirmed sponsorship means none was explicitly found in this sample, not that sponsorship is unavailable.
This snapshot describes the employer’s current visible vacancies—things such as pay disclosure and work arrangement. It is not an employee-satisfaction or hiring-quality rating, and different currencies stay separate.
Work-location intelligence
Remote Freedom
Highly location-flexible
Why this score?
- The source describes the role as open worldwide or globally.
Flexibility signals detected
- Worldwide or global remote eligibility is explicitly indicated.
Remote Freedom measures observable location flexibility only. Unknown work-location information remains unscored. Timezone wording is penalized only when it appears restrictive; general collaboration across time zones is not treated as a restriction. A score does not guarantee legal work eligibility, payroll availability or visa sponsorship.
International applicant intelligence
Visa & relocation signals
Sponsorship status is shown only when the listing provides clear enough wording. Employer history or headquarters location is not used to guess an answer.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough sponsorship statement.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough relocation statement.
Tradeoff check
What’s the catch?
No obvious trade-off appears in the available job details. That does not mean the role has no drawbacks, so the original listing and employment terms are still worth reading carefully.
Current alternatives
Better-paying alternatives
These current roles show a materially higher annualized salary midpoint in the same broad occupation and currency. Similar seniority, country, work arrangement, employment type and recency are preferred where possible; higher pay alone does not make an alternative a better fit.
Chief of Staff to the CEO
Mozilla · Canada, Germany, UK, USA
Region-restricted remoteWhy comparable: Same seniority band · Similar work-location arrangement · Same employment type
VP of People (Remote, US)
Maze · USA
Region-restricted remoteWhy comparable: Same seniority band · Similar work-location arrangement · Same employment type
Director, Strategic Partnerships
Flex · USA
Region-restricted remoteWhy comparable: Same seniority band · Similar work-location arrangement · Same employment type
Alternatives are drawn from the current inventory rather than presented as application recommendations. A pay difference needs to be meaningful—about 3% or more at the midpoint—and different currencies are not compared.
Application-path intelligence
What can we see about the application process?
Provider-mediated application path
The current application path comes through a publisher or aggregator. The destination may still lead to an employer-authorized hiring system, but that is not clear enough to assume.
Current destination: himalayas.app · HTTPS
Visible application steps or requirements
- An assessment, test or work-sample step is explicitly mentioned.
Application effort is estimated from visible listing and source details. Optional steps are kept separate from mandatory ones, and the external form may contain additional requirements that are not visible here.
Application safety context
Application safety check
Basic application-safety context available
The current application destination has a basic transport-safety signal such as HTTPS. This does not verify the employer, vacancy, recruiter or application process.
Evidence checked: Source provenance · Application destination · Listing wording
Observable transport-safety signals
- The available application destination uses HTTPS.
Before you share money or sensitive information
- Confirm the vacancy on the employer’s official careers site when practical, especially if a recruiter contacts you outside the listed application path.
- Check that recruiter email domains and application destinations are consistent with the employer or an identifiable recruiting provider.
- Do not pay application, processing, training or equipment fees merely to be considered for a job.
- Do not send cryptocurrency, gift cards, online-banking credentials or PINs as part of an application.
- Treat unusually fast offers or interviews conducted only through informal messaging channels as reasons to verify the employer independently.
This is a limited safety screen, not employer verification and not a fraud determination. Never send money, cryptocurrency, passwords or sensitive banking credentials merely because a listing appears on a job platform.
Original listing details
The section below comes from the listing source. The decision sections above use the job’s structured pay, location, qualification, mobility and application details to give you additional context.
Associate Director, Instructional Impact
College Board - CRA
Location: This is a remote role. Candidates who live near CB offices have the option of being fully remote or hybrid (Tuesday and Wednesday in office). All CB employees are required to occasionally travel to meet in person for business purposes.
Role Type: This is a full-time position
About the Team
The SAT Suite Program Access team leads the national strategy, implementation, and partner engagement efforts supporting states and districts administering the SAT Suite of Assessments. As digital transformation accelerates, our work increasingly centers on scalable systems, strong district partnerships, and effective implementation models that ensure every student benefits from high-quality assessment insights. As part of the K-12 SAT Suite Program Management & Partner Success team, we enable customer success, reinforce the value of the SAT Suite, and strengthen College Board's partnership with critical customers.
Program Access is organized around three peer Director functions, Instructional Strategy & Resource Systems, Community Strategy & Implementation, and Program Success Enablement, each of which owns a distinct set of educator- and partner-facing resources. This role sits alongside all three, providing the shared technical and instructional design capacity that turns each function's flagship resources into interactive, scalable digital experiences.
About the Opportunity
The Associate Director, Instructional Impact designs and builds digital companions, interactive, technology-enabled complements to core instructional, community, and enablement resources, in direct support of all three Program Access Directors and determines how each flagship resource is translated into an interactive experience. This role reports to the Senior Director, SAT Suite Program Access and Instructional Impact, and advises each Director on which resources warrant a companion and sets the design approach for each.
In the first months of this role, primary focus will be placed on partnering with the Director, SAT Suite Instructional Strategy & Resource Systems, building digital companions for flagship assets such as the Skills Insight Instructional Resource, the MVP Toolkit, and Teacher Implementation Guide updates, bringing these programs to scale quickly. From there, this role expands standardized digital companion support to the Community Strategy & Implementation and Program Success Enablement functions, ensuring all three directors benefit from a single, consistent, and reusable approach to digital companion development.
In this role, you will:
Build Digital Companions Supporting Our Instructional Strategy Team (≈40%)
- Advise the director on which instructional assets to prioritize for companions and recommend the design approach for each.
- Design and build digital companions for flagship instructional assets, including an interactive resource that helps students build test-taking skills, a starter toolkit for new districts, and updated guides that help teachers apply assessment results in the classroom
- Decide how to restructure, condense, and sequence complex instructional content for interactive formats, weighing audience needs, accessibility, and build effort
- Accelerate time-to-scale for priority instructional resources by pairing static materials with companion digital experiences
Extend Digital Companion Support Across Our District Engagement and Field Enablement Teams (≈30%)
- Build digital companions in support of district engagement resources (for example, materials used to onboard and engage school districts in our community network, and kits used for in-person and virtual convenings)
- Build digital companions in support of field enablement resources (for example, our field team's implementation and training deck used on the road, and content in our internal enablement resource hub)
- Select the design approach for each companion based on its audience and use case (educators, districts, or field teams)
Establish a Standardized, Reusable Digital Companion Format (≈15%)
- Own the companion standard, making and documenting decisions on format, tooling, accessibility approach, and component design, and determining when a request warrants an exception.
- Set and maintain the documentation, templates, and component library that govern future builds
- Reduce build time and increase consistency as companion coverage expands
Drive Cross-Functional Prioritization & Alignment (≈15%)
- Recommend which resources receive digital companions and in what sequence, based on expected engagement impact and build effort, and secure alignment from the senior director and directors before development begins
- Use usage data and partner feedback to continuously refine and expand digital companion coverage
- Report on digital companion adoption and engagement impact across all three functions
About You
- Bachelor's degree required; advanced degree (e.g., M.Ed., instructional design, educational technology) preferred
- 3–5+ years of experience in instructional design, digital learning development, or educational technology content development
- Required proficiency in authoring and publishing tools, including Articulate Storyline 360, Articulate Rise, Adobe Captivate, and Adobe Creative Cloud
- Experience developing interactive digital learning assets, including simulations, multimedia, and JavaScript extensions
- Familiarity with LMS technologies and emerging standards such as xAPI and cmi5
- Experience implementing ADA Section 508/WCAG accessibility requirements in digital learning materials
- Strong project management skills, with the ability to manage multiple concurrent stakeholders and priorities
- Strong collaboration skills and the ability to work across a diverse set of colleagues, functions, and divisions
- Commitment to educational equity and improving outcomes for students nationwide
- The ability to travel occasionally to College Board offices or on behalf of College Board business
- Bilingual candidates preferred
- Experience building scalable "digital companion" or micro-learning models that complement larger static instructional or resource assets
- Experience supporting multiple internal stakeholders or teams simultaneously with competing priorities and timelines
- A track record of standing up reusable design systems, templates, or component libraries that reduced production time across a team
All roles at College Board require:
- A passion for expanding educational and career opportunities and mission-driven work
- Curiosity and enthusiasm for emerging technologies, with a willingness to experiment with and adopt new AI-driven solutions and comfort with learning and applying new digital tools independently and proactively.
- Clear and concise communication skills, written and verbal
- A learner's mindset and a commitment to growth: welcoming diverse perspectives, giving and receiving timely, respectful feedback, and continuously improving through iterative learning and user input.
- A drive for impact and excellence: solving complex problems, making data-informed decisions, prioritizing what matters most, and continuously improving through learning, user input, and external benchmarking.
- A collaborative and empathetic approach: working across differences, fostering trust, and contributing to a culture of shared success
- Authorization to work in the United States
About Our Process
- Application review will begin immediately and will continue until the position is filled. This role is expected to accept applications for a minimum of 5 business days.
- While the hiring process may vary, it generally includes: resume and application submission, recruiter phone/video screen, hiring manager interview, performance exercise such as live coding, a panel interview, a conversation with leadership and reference checks.
What We Offer
At College Board, we offer more than a paycheck: we provide a meaningful career, a supportive team, and a comprehensive package designed to help you thrive. We’re a self-sustaining nonprofit that believes in fair and competitive compensation grounded in your qualifications, experience, impact, and the market.
A Thoughtful Approach to Compensation
- The hiring range for this role is $56,000 - $95,000.
- Your exact salary will depend on your location, experience, and how your background compares to others in similar roles at the College Board.
- We aim to make our best offer upfront, rooted in fairness, transparency, and market data.
- We adjust salaries by location to ensure fairness, no matter where you live.
You’ll have open, transparent conversations about compensation, benefits, and what it’s like to work at College Board throughout your hiring process. Check out our careers page for more.
#li-remote
#li-dr1
Originally posted on Himalayas
Listing provenance
Where did this job come from?
See where this vacancy came from and whether more than one current source can still support it. Source names help with traceability and attribution; they are not endorsements or guarantees.
At least one enabled source recently observed the vacancy. The source chain is traceable, but this is not independent employer verification.
- Continuity
- One recent renewable source
- Source-class independence
- One renewable source class
- Last source observation
- Observed in the current source window
This records when High Paid Job last observed the vacancy in source evidence. It confirms source presence, not that the employer edited the vacancy at that time.
- 1 enabled source recently observed this vacancy.
Source confidence is about traceability and continuity. It is separate from application safety and should not be read as an employer reputation rating.
The vacancy is supplied by an external job publisher. Source information helps show where the listing came from; it is not a guarantee about the employer or vacancy.
Listing source: Himalayas. Destination: himalayas.app. The application opens in a new tab so you can keep this report open.