Job intelligence
Frontend-utvecklare till Startup
Distans
Before relying on the listing: Confirm Compensation with the employer or source. See verification questions
Executive opportunity brief
The decision in one screen
A compact evidence-first read of compensation, flexibility, mobility and what still needs verification. No universal quality score is used.
Fast read
Opportunity DNA
The available details do not point to a single standout advantage yet. The clearest issue to weigh is the pay picture is incomplete.
A financial comparison will need the approved compensation range.
The work arrangement can be assessed, although it is not among the most flexible patterns detected.
The listing does not make the minimum education or experience threshold clear enough yet.
Sponsorship and relocation support are not clear from the current listing.
Part of the application route can be assessed, but the full external process may contain additional steps.
At least one recent enabled source can still renew this vacancy.
This fingerprint summarizes what is clear, constrained or still unanswered in the current listing. It is a reading aid, not an overall job score.
Decision evidence check
4 of 5 core facts stated
This checks whether the listing states the facts that commonly change an employment decision. It measures disclosure completeness, not whether the opportunity is good or bad.
Facts already stated
- Work arrangement
- Location eligibility
- Application closing time
- Employment type
What to verify next
- Compensation: What is the approved compensation range, and what portion is guaranteed base pay rather than variable compensation?
Unknown information is never converted into a negative score. The questions above exist to prevent missing evidence from being mistaken for a favorable term.
Decision levers
What could make or break the fit?
Reasons to look closer
Nothing stands out strongly enough yet to call a clear advantage. The role may still be attractive for reasons the listing does not spell out.
Trade-offs to weigh
- The pay picture is incomplete: No usable salary range is stated, so a meaningful financial comparison is not possible yet.
Questions worth asking before you invest more time
- Ask for the approved compensation range before comparing this opportunity financially.
- Confirm which countries employees may work from and whether payroll-country, timezone or office-attendance restrictions apply.
- Confirm whether a degree is actually required, preferred, or replaceable with equivalent experience.
- Confirm the actual minimum experience requirement rather than assuming preferred background is mandatory.
- Ask whether visa sponsorship is available before investing significant time in the application.
These questions come from details the listing leaves open. An unanswered point is not treated as a disadvantage.
Salary transparency context
Is pay disclosure typical for this kind of role?
This listing does not state usable structured compensation, and the current role sample is still too small for a reliable disclosure-rate comparison.
Compensation counts only when amount, ISO currency and supported pay period are all known.
At least ten current comparable roles are required before HPJ publishes a disclosure percentage.
Employer-level comparison is withheld until enough current employer listings are available.
This compares salary-disclosure behavior in current visible listings. It does not compare raw salary amounts across currencies, infer undisclosed pay as zero, or rate employer quality.
Private offer & negotiation lab
Turn an offer into evidence, not guesswork
Enter an annual base offer and, if you want, your own target. HPJ compares only within one explicit currency and never chooses a target for you.
Negotiation evidence available: strong decision evidence.
Enter an annual base offer to compare it with explicit same-currency evidence. HPJ will not suggest a target for you.
Review the full package · 10 terms
Mark what is confirmed, what needs clarification and what you want to prioritize. These choices and notes stay in this browser.
The approved base-pay range is not established in the listing.
Variable compensation is mentioned; verify amount, formula, target and eligibility.
Equity or long-term incentive language is mentioned; verify grant type, vesting and valuation basis.
Retirement or pension benefits are mentioned; verify employer contribution and vesting.
Health-benefit language is mentioned; verify coverage, dependants and employee cost.
Paid-leave language is mentioned; verify the exact entitlement and carry-over rules.
A work-arrangement signal is available; verify schedule details before relying on it.
Relocation support not established
Sponsorship not established
A review cycle is mentioned; verify timing and whether compensation can change at that review.
Questions worth taking into the offer conversation
- What is the approved base-pay range for this role?
- Is there a bonus, commission or other variable-pay component, and how is it calculated?
- Does the package include equity or another long-term incentive, and what are the vesting terms?
- What retirement or pension contribution does the employer provide?
- What health coverage is included and what costs remain with the employee?
- How much paid leave is provided and what are the carry-over or blackout rules?
- If relocation is relevant, what expenses, timing and repayment conditions are covered?
- What exact sponsorship or work-authorization conditions apply to this role?
Skill bridge
What does this role connect to?
The listing contains useful skill signals, while the current occupation sample is still too thin for a broader comparison.
Skills named in this listing
Shared with the current career sample
The occupation sample is still too thin for a reliable shared-skill comparison.
Application edge
- If these skills match your background, prepare one concrete example that shows how you used Figma, JavaScript, and TypeScript rather than relying on a keyword-only claim.
- The listing mentions extra application steps. Review those requirements before starting so you can prepare the requested material in one pass.
Skill signals come from explicit text mentions. A mention is not automatically a requirement, and absence from the current top-skill list does not make a skill rare or unimportant.
Application Decision Lab
Turn the listing into a preparation plan
Separate what the listing actually states from what you still need to prepare or verify. Your selections and short notes stay in this browser and are never submitted to High Paid Job.
Figma
This skill or technology is explicitly mentioned in the available listing text. A mention is not automatically a mandatory requirement; prepare a concrete example only if it is relevant to your experience.
JavaScript
This skill or technology is explicitly mentioned in the available listing text. A mention is not automatically a mandatory requirement; prepare a concrete example only if it is relevant to your experience.
TypeScript
This skill or technology is explicitly mentioned in the available listing text. A mention is not automatically a mandatory requirement; prepare a concrete example only if it is relevant to your experience.
Prepare for a stated application step
A portfolio or work sample is explicitly mentioned.
Questions worth resolving before you rely on the opportunity
- Compensation: What is the approved compensation range, and what portion is guaranteed base pay rather than variable compensation?
- Work authorization / sponsorship: If sponsorship or work authorization matters to you, what exact immigration or employer-sponsorship conditions apply to this role?
Decision analysis
What the listing really tells you
For Frontend-utvecklare till Startup at Distans, the most useful clues right now are work-location flexibility has usable detail, the application route gives a few useful clues, and the listing can be traced to a current source. Looking at them together makes the trade-offs easier to see.
Work-location flexibility has usable detail
Location flexibility can be assessed here: Remote with some uncertainty or restrictions, with a Remote Freedom reading of 68/100.
The application route gives a few useful clues
More direct application path · 1 visible process step. The external application may contain additional steps that are not visible from the listing itself.
The listing can be traced to a current source
1 recent enabled source can currently renew this vacancy across 1 source classes. That improves traceability, although it does not verify the employer itself.
How this analysis is assembled
The brief pulls together the parts of the vacancy that can be compared reliably today. Gaps in the listing remain visible instead of being filled with assumptions.
Analysis evidence coverage
How much analysis can the current evidence support?
This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
Measures observable location flexibility and explicit restrictions; it does not determine whether remote work is personally desirable.
Missing compensation is not treated as negative evidence; this dimension simply remains unavailable.
The source posting date is today.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
There is no universal opportunity score because pay, flexibility and access matter differently to different people. Compare Jobs lets you weight the evidence around your own priorities.
Decision checklist
What is supported, uncertain or worth checking?
This checklist separates supported strengths, visible cautions and missing evidence. It is not an overall recommendation or guarantee that the job is suitable for you.
Supported strengths
- Recent provenance includes a comparatively direct source lane, improving traceability.
- The current provenance provides a comparatively direct application route.
Visible cautions
No specific caution is supported by the currently available evidence. This does not prove that none exists.
Still unknown
- There is not enough comparable salary evidence to establish this job’s current pay position.
- Visa sponsorship is not established by the available listing data.
Pay vs. barriers
Opportunity Efficiency not assessed
The current pay position is not reliable enough to weigh compensation against the stated barriers.
- Current comparable pay position is unavailable.
- Education requirement is not established.
- Required prior-experience level is not established.
This section weighs pay context against clearly stated barriers without collapsing unlike requirements into one universal score. Degree, experience, licensing, clearance and location limits remain separate, and missing qualification details stay unknown.
Beyond the headline
Not enough evidence for a hidden-value finding
Potential hidden value appears only when several distinct non-pay advantages are actually supported. Missing requirements or benefits are never counted as positives.
Hidden Value is an experimental evidence summary, not an investment-style score or guarantee of employability. It only uses explicit current listing evidence and does not infer that an unmentioned qualification is unnecessary.
Compensation intelligence
How competitive is this pay?
This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
Why this analysis?
- This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
- Salary confidence: Not available. No disclosed salary can currently be normalized for comparison. Missing compensation is not treated as low-quality salary evidence.
- Range quality: No disclosed range.
Employer compensation communication
Pay transparency at Distans
Limited current pay transparency
This score uses the employer’s current visible listings and combines how often pay is disclosed with how useful those ranges are. Bonus, equity and benefit mentions are shown separately and do not raise the score.
This pattern comes from the employer’s current visible vacancies. It describes hiring and pay transparency in those listings, not employee satisfaction or a permanent judgement of the employer.
Current employer intelligence
Distans — current opportunity snapshot
Employer Evidence Profile
How often this employer’s current visible sampled vacancies state decision-critical information. These percentages describe evidence coverage, not employer quality.
Current sampled listings with advertised compensation evidence.
Current sampled listings whose work arrangement is clearer than unknown.
Current sampled listings with a supported country signal.
Current sampled listings with an explicit closing time.
Current sampled listings with a usable posting date.
Current sampled listings that explicitly indicate confirmed, possible or unavailable sponsorship evidence.
Current sampled listings with an explicit relocation signal.
Low coverage means the current visible listings state the information less often. It does not prove that the employer lacks the policy, benefit or support.
Common current occupation families: Software engineering (6) · Operations (3) · Sales (2)
Visible seniority mix: Early-career (8) · Senior / lead (8) · Leadership (1)
Current employment-type mix: Full time (115) · Part time (47)
Most visible hiring countries in this sample: Sweden (176)
Other current roles from this employer
Senior Java Developer High-Scalability Systems - 20516 - Remote (Sweden)
Sverige
Senior / lead · Remote — restrictions unclearMontörer av 19-tums rackskåp
Sverige
Seniority not clearly specified · On-site / hybridFullstackutvecklare till Faverli
Sverige
Seniority not clearly specified · Remote — restrictions unclearErfaren telefonförsäljare inom städtjänster Deltid, distansarbete
Sverige
Seniority not clearly specified · Remote — restrictions unclearThese are other current vacancies visible from the same employer, not endorsements or evidence of future hiring plans.
There are not yet five current disclosed salaries in one currency, so an employer pay median would be too thin to be useful.
Questions worth asking this employer
- What compensation range applies to this role, and which parts of total compensation are fixed versus variable?
- If work authorization matters to you, what sponsorship policy applies to this specific role and location?
- If a move is required, is relocation assistance available for this position?
These questions are prompted by missing or thin evidence in the employer’s current visible vacancies. Missing evidence is not treated as a negative judgement.
This employer snapshot uses the employer’s current visible listings. Remote and sponsorship rates use only vacancies with explicit evidence, while missing information stays unknown. Salary medians are shown separately by currency and need at least five disclosed salaries. Zero confirmed sponsorship means none was explicitly found in this sample, not that sponsorship is unavailable.
This snapshot describes the employer’s current visible vacancies—things such as pay disclosure and work arrangement. It is not an employee-satisfaction or hiring-quality rating, and different currencies stay separate.
Work-location intelligence
Remote Freedom
Remote with some uncertainty or restrictions
Why this score?
- The role is remote, but the exact applicant-location restrictions are not clear.
Remote Freedom measures observable location flexibility only. Unknown work-location information remains unscored. Timezone wording is penalized only when it appears restrictive; general collaboration across time zones is not treated as a restriction. A score does not guarantee legal work eligibility, payroll availability or visa sponsorship.
International applicant intelligence
Visa & relocation signals
Sponsorship status is shown only when the listing provides clear enough wording. Employer history or headquarters location is not used to guess an answer.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough sponsorship statement.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough relocation statement.
Tradeoff check
What’s the catch?
No obvious trade-off appears in the available job details. That does not mean the role has no drawbacks, so the original listing and employment terms are still worth reading carefully.
Application-path intelligence
What can we see about the application process?
More direct application path
The primary route is a direct-employer, employer-authorized hiring or official government source. That can reduce intermediary steps, although the external form may still be lengthy.
Current destination: faverli.com · HTTPS
Visible application steps or requirements
- A portfolio or work sample is explicitly mentioned.
Application effort is estimated from visible listing and source details. Optional steps are kept separate from mandatory ones, and the external form may contain additional requirements that are not visible here.
Application safety context
Application safety check
Basic application-safety context available
The current application destination has a basic transport-safety signal such as HTTPS. This does not verify the employer, vacancy, recruiter or application process.
Evidence checked: Source provenance · Application destination · Listing wording
Observable transport-safety signals
- The available application destination uses HTTPS.
Before you share money or sensitive information
- Confirm the vacancy on the employer’s official careers site when practical, especially if a recruiter contacts you outside the listed application path.
- Check that recruiter email domains and application destinations are consistent with the employer or an identifiable recruiting provider.
- Do not pay application, processing, training or equipment fees merely to be considered for a job.
- Do not send cryptocurrency, gift cards, online-banking credentials or PINs as part of an application.
- Treat unusually fast offers or interviews conducted only through informal messaging channels as reasons to verify the employer independently.
This is a limited safety screen, not employer verification and not a fraud determination. Never send money, cryptocurrency, passwords or sensitive banking credentials merely because a listing appears on a job platform.
Original listing details
The section below comes from the listing source. The decision sections above use the job’s structured pay, location, qualification, mobility and application details to give you additional context.
Ansök via Faverli.com och skicka in din ansökan genom Faverli-appen.
Vill du ta dina första steg som frontendutvecklare i ett bolag där ditt arbete syns direkt? Hos Faverli får du vara med och forma digitala tjänster som gör det lättare för unga att hitta sin plats i arbetslivet.
Det här är Faverli
Faverli är en svensk startup med rötter i Stockholms universitet. Vi finns till för studenter och nyexaminerade som vill komma in på arbetsmarknaden, och vi gör det enklare för dem att hitta jobb som passar och att knyta kontakt med arbetsgivare.
Med vår app och vår AI-assistent Faverli Buddy guidar vi användare till möjligheter som matchar deras intressen och bakgrund. Arbetsgivare får i sin tur en kanal för att nå morgondagens talanger.
Vi är ett litet men drivet team mitt i en tidig tillväxtfas, där vägen från idé till lansering är kort. Under 2026 har vi tagit oss till semifinal i BLINGs tävling För-orten.
Rollen
Som junior frontendutvecklare bygger du gränssnitt som är snygga, smidiga och fungerar lika bra på mobil som på dator. Du jobbar tätt tillsammans med grundarna och samarbetar med design och backend för att ta fram funktioner som verkligen gör nytta för våra användare.
Du får förtroende från första dagen, utrymme att driva egna idéer och chansen att växa genom att jobba med riktiga problem i en startup som är på väg uppåt.
Vad du kommer att göra
- Bygga och vidareutveckla gränssnitt i både app och webb.
- Ta fram responsiva och tillgängliga komponenter baserat på designskisser och användarnas behov.
- Utveckla funktioner kring användarprofiler, jobbmatchning och prenumerationer.
- Koppla ihop frontend med våra API:er i samarbete med backendsidan.
- Medverka i kodgranskningar, tester och kvalitetsarbete.
- Lyssna på användarnas feedback och komma med förslag som gör upplevelsen bättre.
- Tillsammans med teamet ständigt förbättra och utveckla produkten.
Vi tror att du
- Studerar eller har studerat exempelvis systemvetenskap, datavetenskap eller frontendutveckling – eller har skaffat dig motsvarande kunskaper genom egna projekt.
- Har en grund i HTML, CSS och JavaScript eller TypeScript.
- Är bekant med Git och vet hur versionshantering fungerar.
- Brinner för webbutveckling, användarupplevelse och ny teknik.
- Uttrycker dig obehindrat på svenska och/eller engelska.
- Är nyfiken, lösningsfokuserad och vill växa tillsammans med andra.
Det är ett plus om du
- Har jobbat med mobilappar eller mobilutveckling.
- Kan Figma eller är intresserad av UX/UI-design.
- Har egna projekt eller en portfolio att visa upp.
- Har erfarenhet av att jobba i små team eller startups.
- Är intresserad av AI, digitala produkter och hur teknik kan underlätta vardagen.
Din personlighet
Du tycker om att lära dig nytt, är inte rädd för att pröva egna idéer och tar gärna initiativ när du ser att något kan bli bättre. Du behöver inte ha alla svar från början – det som räknas är en stabil grund, ett äkta intresse för utveckling och en vilja att hela tiden bli bättre.
Du känner dig hemma där det går snabbt, där beslut fattas utan krångel och där du har verkligt inflytande över produkten. Du gillar att samarbeta men klarar dig också bra på egen hand och tar ansvar för det du gör.
Det här får du hos oss
- Chansen att bygga en produkt från grunden.
- Mycket ansvar och möjlighet att påverka både tekniska lösningar och användarupplevelse.
- Nära samarbete med grundarna och en snabb inlärningskurva.
- Full flexibilitet – du jobbar helt på distans.
- Möjlighet att vässa dina tekniska kunskaper genom praktiskt arbete.
- Ett engagerat team med ett tydligt mål: att göra vägen in i arbetslivet enklare för studenter och nyexaminerade.
Vi hoppas att få höra från dig!
Öppen för alla Vi fokuserar på din kompetens, inte dina övriga förutsättningar. Vi är öppna för att anpassa rollen eller arbetsplatsen efter dina behov.
Listing provenance
Where did this job come from?
See where this vacancy came from and whether more than one current source can still support it. Source names help with traceability and attribution; they are not endorsements or guarantees.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
- Continuity
- One recent renewable source
- Source-class independence
- One renewable source class
- Last source observation
- Observed today
This records when High Paid Job last observed the vacancy in source evidence. It confirms source presence, not that the employer edited the vacancy at that time.
- 1 enabled source recently observed this vacancy.
- At least one recent enabled source is a direct-employer, employer-authorized or official public source.
Source confidence is about traceability and continuity. It is separate from application safety and should not be read as an employer reputation rating.
This vacancy is supplied through an official public employment service. The source identifies where the listing was published; it is not an employer endorsement.
Listing source: Arbetsförmedlingen. Destination: faverli.com. The application opens in a new tab so you can keep this report open.