Job intelligence
HR Compliance Attorney
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Before relying on the listing: Confirm Work arrangement with the employer or source. See verification questions
Executive opportunity brief
The decision in one screen
A compact evidence-first read of compensation, flexibility, mobility and what still needs verification. No universal quality score is used.
Fast read
Opportunity DNA
Worth a closer look because the application route looks comparatively direct; confirm which countries employees may work from and whether payroll-country, timezone or office-attendance restrictions apply.
Current comparable position is around the 4th percentile.
Country, timezone, payroll or office-attendance limits still need confirmation.
The listing does not make the minimum education or experience threshold clear enough yet.
Sponsorship and relocation support are not clear from the current listing.
The visible path is straightforward and no additional mandatory step is stated in the available listing text.
At least one recent enabled source can still renew this vacancy.
This fingerprint summarizes what is clear, constrained or still unanswered in the current listing. It is a reading aid, not an overall job score.
Decision evidence check
4 of 5 core facts stated
This checks whether the listing states the facts that commonly change an employment decision. It measures disclosure completeness, not whether the opportunity is good or bad.
Facts already stated
- Compensation
- Advertised location
- Application closing time
- Employment type
What to verify next
- Work arrangement: What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
Advertised location is not proof of work authorization, sponsorship, or legal eligibility. Unknown information is not a negative score; verify those questions separately.
Decision levers
What could make or break the fit?
Reasons to look closer
- The application route looks comparatively direct: The primary route points through an employer, an employer-authorized hiring source or an official employment source, and no extra mandatory step is stated in the listing text.
Trade-offs to weigh
No major trade-off is stated clearly in the information available here. Employment terms outside the listing may still matter.
Questions worth asking before you invest more time
- Confirm which countries employees may work from and whether payroll-country, timezone or office-attendance restrictions apply.
- Confirm whether a degree is actually required, preferred, or replaceable with equivalent experience.
- Confirm the actual minimum experience requirement rather than assuming preferred background is mandatory.
- Ask whether visa sponsorship is available before investing significant time in the application.
These questions come from details the listing leaves open. An unanswered point is not treated as a disadvantage.
Opportunity neighborhood
Keep your options open
These live roles sit close enough to this opportunity to make useful comparison points. Look across several employers before deciding what pay, flexibility or access trade-offs you are willing to accept.
Assistant Chief Counsel
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration · Washington, District of Columbia
Why it is nearby: Same country · Same employment type · Recently posted
About 131% higher advertised midpoint
Senior Director, Corporate Counsel
1Password · Canada, USA
Why it is nearby: Same country · Same employment type · Recently posted
About 319% higher advertised midpoint
Senior Commercial Counsel
Redox · USA
Why it is nearby: Same country · Same employment type · Recently posted
About 109% higher advertised midpoint
Supervisory Attorney-Adviser (Labor)
Office of the Secretary of the Army · Fort Belvoir, Virginia
Why it is nearby: Same country · Recently posted
About 128% higher advertised midpoint
Different angle: Seniority is not explicit
This neighborhood is drawn from current inventory in the same broad occupation. Similarity is based on explicit listing facts; missing details do not count against a job.
Role market context
How much current choice is visible around this kind of work?
This compares the vacancy with current High Paid Job inventory in the broad Legal & compliance roles family. It describes visible choice and disclosure, not future demand or career quality.
200 most recent current roles sampled for the disclosure measures below.
Distinct employers in the bounded current sample, not an estimate of all employers hiring in the market.
Current sampled roles stating at least four of the five Core Decision Facts.
Requires a numeric amount, explicit ISO currency and supported pay period.
Listings with explicit enough remote, hybrid or on-site evidence to classify.
Missing deadline evidence remains unknown and is not interpreted as an open-ended application window.
Currencies with explicit pay evidence in the sample: USD (136) · EUR (1) · GBP (1). Raw amounts across different currencies are not compared.
This describes current visible High Paid Job inventory in the same broad occupation family. Percentages use a bounded recent sample and are not a forecast, a complete labor-market census or an employer-quality measure.
Constraint opportunity lab
What changes the size of the current opportunity pool?
Each line applies one stricter evidence-based constraint to the same bounded current role-family sample. It helps you see the trade-off in visible choice without deciding which trade-off is right for you.
Counts only affirmative or possible sponsorship evidence, or relocation explicitly offered. Unknown is not treated as no.
A much stricter subset: only listings with explicit worldwide-remote evidence remain.
Counts roles explicitly classified as worldwide remote, region-restricted remote or remote with restrictions still unclear.
Shows the subset with enough stated evidence for a more informed first comparison.
Requires amount, explicit ISO currency and a supported pay period. Missing pay evidence remains unknown.
Uses only roles where a country is known. Roles without country evidence are excluded from this denominator.
Uses only roles with a stated employment type.
Only same-currency opportunities with usable annualized pay enter this comparison. Other currencies are not converted or treated as lower.
These are counterfactual filters over a bounded sample of current HPJ inventory in the same broad occupation family. They show how visible choice changes when one evidence-based constraint is applied; they do not tell you which constraint you should choose or predict hiring outcomes. The calculation uses the 200 most recent current roles from 466 visible roles in this broad family.
Salary transparency context
Is pay disclosure typical for this kind of role?
This listing states usable structured compensation. About 69% of the bounded current role sample does the same.
Compensation counts only when amount, ISO currency and supported pay period are all known.
Pay disclosure is mixed but appears in at least half of the current role sample.
This employer’s current visible listings disclose pay materially more often than the current same-role sample.
This compares salary-disclosure behavior in current visible listings. It does not compare raw salary amounts across currencies, infer undisclosed pay as zero, or rate employer quality.
Private offer & negotiation lab
Turn an offer into evidence, not guesswork
Enter an annual base offer and, if you want, your own target. HPJ compares only within one explicit currency and never chooses a target for you.
Negotiation evidence available: advertised pay range, current same-currency market context, strong decision evidence.
Enter an annual base offer to compare it with explicit same-currency evidence. HPJ will not suggest a target for you.
Review the full package · 10 terms
Mark what is confirmed, what needs clarification and what you want to prioritize. These choices and notes stay in this browser.
Usable advertised compensation is available.
Variable compensation is mentioned; verify amount, formula, target and eligibility.
Equity or long-term incentive language is mentioned; verify grant type, vesting and valuation basis.
Retirement or pension benefits are mentioned; verify employer contribution and vesting.
Health-benefit language is mentioned; verify coverage, dependants and employee cost.
Paid-leave language is mentioned; verify the exact entitlement and carry-over rules.
The work arrangement is not established clearly enough.
Relocation support not established
Sponsorship not established
A review cycle is mentioned; verify timing and whether compensation can change at that review.
Questions worth taking into the offer conversation
- Is there a bonus, commission or other variable-pay component, and how is it calculated?
- Does the package include equity or another long-term incentive, and what are the vesting terms?
- What office attendance, travel or timezone-overlap expectations apply in practice?
- If relocation is relevant, what expenses, timing and repayment conditions are covered?
- What exact sponsorship or work-authorization conditions apply to this role?
- When is the first performance and compensation review after joining?
- What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
Occupation intelligence
What broader career references connect to this role?
HPJ uses broad comparison families for current-market analysis. External taxonomy results are reference candidates for that broad family, not a declaration that this vacancy has been authoritatively classified into a specific occupation.
European occupation references
- legal service manager
- mergers and acquisitions analyst
- scopist
- lawyer linguist
- legal administrative assistant
This service uses the ESCO classification of the European Commission.
U.S. occupation references
- Paralegals and Legal Assistants 23-2011.00
- Legal Secretaries and Administrative Assistants 43-6012.00
- Legal Support Workers, All Other 23-2099.00
- Lawyers 23-1011.00
- Compliance Managers 11-9199.02
This site incorporates information from O*NET Web Services by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA.
Career reference research
Skills worth investigating
Official occupational context, paired with exact phrases visible in this vacancy. It is not a skills test or an applicant-fit score.
ESCO · European occupation
legal service manager
Usually essential in this ESCO occupation
- cost management
- write work-related reports
- provide legal advice
- legal department processes
- comply with legal regulations
- advise on legal services
- liaise with managers
Context-dependent ESCO skills
- mergers and acquisitions
- use communication techniques
- negotiate in legal cases
- provide legal advice on investments
- prioritise requests
O*NET · U.S. occupation
Paralegals and Legal Assistants
O*NET occupation skills
- WritingPhrase in listing
- Active Listening
- Reading Comprehension
- Speaking
- Critical Thinking
- Active Learning
- Complex Problem Solving
- Judgment and Decision Making
Build my private skill preparation brief Your evidence · Practice · Interview questions
Plan how you might demonstrate or investigate occupational skills. These are broad-family reference examples, not confirmed vacancy requirements. Nothing you enter is sent to High Paid Job.
Private to this browser. Up to 20 reference skills; not a qualification assessment or hiring prediction.
Useful next question: Which of these occupational reference skills does the hiring manager actually expect for this specific role, and what evidence would demonstrate them?
These skills belong to one reference occupation selected for HPJ’s broad career family, not a verified classification of this vacancy. Text overlap only means a phrase appears in the available listing text; it does not establish an employer requirement, your proficiency, or a qualification gap. A missing mention is unknown, not a deficit.
Adjacent current roles to investigate
Aviation Safety Inspector, Air Carrier Maintenance, Assistant Partial Program Manager
Federal Aviation Administration · Multiple Locations
same stated country · same seniority bandOPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION PROGRAM MANAGER
Air Mobility Command · McGuire AFB, New Jersey
same stated country · same seniority bandSLCM-N Test Data Program Manager
STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS (SSP) · Washington Navy Yard, District of Columbia
same stated country · same seniority bandAdjacent-family roles are exploration prompts from current HPJ inventory. They are not inferred qualification matches and they do not imply a promotion path.
Skill bridge
What does this role connect to?
This listing names several concrete skills, but they do not currently overlap with the most frequently surfaced skill labels in the sampled Legal & compliance roles opportunities.
Skills named in this listing
Shared with the current career sample
The recognized skills in this listing do not overlap with the current top-skill list for this occupation sample.
Additional signals in this listing: Excel
Application edge
- If these skills match your background, prepare one concrete example that shows how you used Excel rather than relying on a keyword-only claim.
If the named skills are genuinely transferable in your own experience, the occupation map also points to adjacent current families worth researching: Finance & accounting roles and Operations & program roles. This is exploration context, not a qualification match.
Skill signals come from explicit text mentions. A mention is not automatically a requirement, and absence from the current top-skill list does not make a skill rare or unimportant. The current career comparison draws on 120 sampled listings; 49 contain a recognized skill signal.
Application Decision Lab
Turn the listing into a preparation plan
Separate what the listing actually states from what you still need to prepare or verify. Your selections and short notes stay in this browser and are never submitted to High Paid Job.
Excel
This skill or technology is explicitly mentioned in the available listing text. A mention is not automatically a mandatory requirement; prepare a concrete example only if it is relevant to your experience.
Questions worth resolving before you rely on the opportunity
- Work arrangement: What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
- Work authorization / sponsorship: If sponsorship or work authorization matters to you, what exact immigration or employer-sponsorship conditions apply to this role?
- Application process: What interview, assessment, portfolio, reference or screening stages are part of the hiring process?
Decision analysis
What the listing really tells you
For HR Compliance Attorney at DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, the most useful clues right now are pay has a useful comparison point, the application route gives a few useful clues, and the listing can be traced to a current source. Looking at them together makes the trade-offs easier to see.
Pay has a useful comparison point
Among 282 current comparable salaries in USD, the normalized annual midpoint is around the 4th percentile. This compares advertised pay in the same currency and does not include every element of total compensation.
The application route gives a few useful clues
More direct application path. The external application may contain additional steps that are not visible from the listing itself.
The listing can be traced to a current source
The opportunity currently has 1 renewable source path across 1 source classes. Multiple independent paths can strengthen continuity, but they are not a substitute for checking the application destination.
How this analysis is assembled
Built from the pay, location, qualification, mobility, application and source details available for this vacancy. Anything the listing leaves unresolved stays unresolved.
Analysis evidence coverage
How much analysis can the current evidence support?
Uses the explainable High Pay Score within the job’s current occupation/seniority/currency comparison sample.
The available listing data is not clear enough to score location flexibility.
The configured source supplied structured salary fields, a usable currency and a focused comparison value.
The listing was posted about 2 days ago.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
There is no universal opportunity score because pay, flexibility and access matter differently to different people. Compare Jobs lets you weight the evidence around your own priorities.
Decision checklist
What is supported, uncertain or worth checking?
This checklist separates supported strengths, visible cautions and missing evidence. It is not an overall recommendation or guarantee that the job is suitable for you.
Supported strengths
- Recent provenance includes a comparatively direct source lane, improving traceability.
- The current provenance provides a comparatively direct application route.
Visible cautions
- Some compensation may be variable or performance-based. Confirm the guaranteed base amount before comparing headline pay.
Still unknown
- The work-location policy is not clear enough for a Remote Freedom assessment.
- Visa sponsorship is not established by the available listing data.
Pay vs. barriers
Pay and barrier context available
The current pay position can be viewed alongside the stated barriers, but the available detail does not support a stronger conclusion.
Comparable disclosed-pay evidence places this job at about 4 / 100 within its current occupation/seniority sample.
- Education requirement is not established.
- Required prior-experience level is not established.
- Work-location flexibility is not established strongly enough for Remote Freedom comparison.
This section weighs pay context against clearly stated barriers without collapsing unlike requirements into one universal score. Degree, experience, licensing, clearance and location limits remain separate, and missing qualification details stay unknown.
Beyond the headline
Not enough evidence for a hidden-value finding
Potential hidden value appears only when several distinct non-pay advantages are actually supported. Missing requirements or benefits are never counted as positives.
Hidden Value is an experimental evidence summary, not an investment-style score or guarantee of employability. It only uses explicit current listing evidence and does not infer that an unmentioned qualification is unnecessary.
Explainable opportunity highlight
Why this opportunity stands out
These are supported signals from the current listing and comparison sample—not a guarantee that this is the best job for you.
The source provides structured salary information with a comparatively focused range, improving the usefulness of pay comparisons.
The listing was posted about 2 days ago.
Compensation intelligence
How competitive is this pay?
Below many comparable disclosed salaries
The annualized midpoint is below the 25th percentile boundary of the current comparable sample.
The highlighted band is the middle 50% of the current comparable sample after the outlier guard. The dark marker is this job’s annualized salary midpoint.
Why this analysis?
- This score reflects the current advertised-pay distribution for comparable active jobs in the same currency. It measures pay position, not overall job quality.
- Salary confidence: High. The configured source supplied structured salary fields, a usable currency and a focused comparison value.
- Range quality: Focused salary range.
Employer compensation communication
Pay transparency at DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Very strong current pay transparency
This score uses the employer’s current visible listings and combines how often pay is disclosed with how useful those ranges are. Bonus, equity and benefit mentions are shown separately and do not raise the score.
This pattern comes from the employer’s current visible vacancies. It describes hiring and pay transparency in those listings, not employee satisfaction or a permanent judgement of the employer.
Current employer intelligence
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION — current opportunity snapshot
Employer Evidence Profile
How often this employer’s current visible sampled vacancies state decision-critical information. These percentages describe evidence coverage, not employer quality.
Current sampled listings with advertised compensation evidence.
Current sampled listings whose work arrangement is clearer than unknown.
Current sampled listings with a supported country signal.
Current sampled listings with an explicit closing time.
Current sampled listings with a usable posting date.
Current sampled listings that explicitly indicate confirmed, possible or unavailable sponsorship evidence.
Current sampled listings with an explicit relocation signal.
Low coverage means the current visible listings state the information less often. It does not prove that the employer lacks the policy, benefit or support.
Common current occupation families: Legal (2) · Data & AI (2) · Healthcare (2)
Visible seniority mix: Early-career (4) · Senior / lead (2)
Current employment-type mix: Full time (19) · Part time (4)
Most visible hiring countries in this sample: United States (23)
Other current roles from this employer
Assistant Commissioner- Training and Development
66-26 Metropolitan Ave., Queen
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearAssociate Commissioner of Operations
75-20 Astoria Blvd
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearCOOK
Rikers Island
Early-career · UnclearDeputy Commissioner, Investigation & Intelligence
75-20 Astoria Blvd
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearThese are other current vacancies visible from the same employer, not endorsements or evidence of future hiring plans.
Current disclosed salary medians by currency
- USD 75,805 median · 23 disclosed salaries
Questions worth asking this employer
- What work-arrangement and location expectations apply to this role in practice?
- If work authorization matters to you, what sponsorship policy applies to this specific role and location?
- If a move is required, is relocation assistance available for this position?
These questions are prompted by missing or thin evidence in the employer’s current visible vacancies. Missing evidence is not treated as a negative judgement.
This employer snapshot uses the employer’s current visible listings. Remote and sponsorship rates use only vacancies with explicit evidence, while missing information stays unknown. Salary medians are shown separately by currency and need at least five disclosed salaries. Zero confirmed sponsorship means none was explicitly found in this sample, not that sponsorship is unavailable.
This snapshot describes the employer’s current visible vacancies—things such as pay disclosure and work arrangement. It is not an employee-satisfaction or hiring-quality rating, and different currencies stay separate.
Work-location intelligence
Remote Freedom
Not enough work-location evidence
Why no score?
- The work-location policy is not clear enough to support a Remote Freedom score.
Remote Freedom measures observable location flexibility only. Unknown work-location information remains unscored. Timezone wording is penalized only when it appears restrictive; general collaboration across time zones is not treated as a restriction. A score does not guarantee legal work eligibility, payroll availability or visa sponsorship.
International applicant intelligence
Visa & relocation signals
Sponsorship status is shown only when the listing provides clear enough wording. Employer history or headquarters location is not used to guess an answer.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough sponsorship statement.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough relocation statement.
Tradeoff check
What’s the catch?
These are visible conditions worth checking before treating the headline compensation as the whole story:
- Some compensation may be variable or performance-based. Confirm the guaranteed base amount before comparing headline pay.
Current alternatives
Better-paying alternatives
These current roles show a materially higher annualized salary midpoint in the same broad occupation and currency. Similar seniority, country, work arrangement, employment type and recency are preferred where possible; higher pay alone does not make an alternative a better fit.
Senior Director, Corporate Counsel
1Password · Canada, USA
Region-restricted remoteWhy comparable: Same country · Same employment type · Recently posted
Assistant Chief Counsel
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration · Washington, District of Columbia
UnclearWhy comparable: Same country · Same employment type · Recently posted
Supervisory Attorney-Adviser (Labor)
Office of the Secretary of the Army · Fort Belvoir, Virginia
UnclearWhy comparable: Same country · Recently posted
Check: Seniority is not explicit in the alternative listing.
Alternatives are drawn from the current inventory rather than presented as application recommendations. A pay difference needs to be meaningful—about 3% or more at the midpoint—and different currencies are not compared.
Application-path intelligence
What can we see about the application process?
More direct application path
The primary route is a direct-employer, employer-authorized hiring or official government source. That can reduce intermediary steps, although the external form may still be lengthy.
Current destination: a127-jobs.nyc.gov · HTTPS
No additional required application step is clear in the available listing text. This does not mean the external application is one-click or friction-free.
Application effort is estimated from visible listing and source details. Optional steps are kept separate from mandatory ones, and the external form may contain additional requirements that are not visible here.
Application safety context
Application safety check
Basic application-safety context available
The current application destination has a basic transport-safety signal such as HTTPS. This does not verify the employer, vacancy, recruiter or application process.
Evidence checked: Source provenance · Application destination · Listing wording
Observable transport-safety signals
- The available application destination uses HTTPS.
Before you share money or sensitive information
- Confirm the vacancy on the employer’s official careers site when practical, especially if a recruiter contacts you outside the listed application path.
- Check that recruiter email domains and application destinations are consistent with the employer or an identifiable recruiting provider.
- Do not pay application, processing, training or equipment fees merely to be considered for a job.
- Do not send cryptocurrency, gift cards, online-banking credentials or PINs as part of an application.
- Treat unusually fast offers or interviews conducted only through informal messaging channels as reasons to verify the employer independently.
This is a limited safety screen, not employer verification and not a fraud determination. Never send money, cryptocurrency, passwords or sensitive banking credentials merely because a listing appears on a job platform.
Original listing details
The section below comes from the listing source. The decision sections above use the job’s structured pay, location, qualification, mobility and application details to give you additional context.
Job description
The New York City Department of Correction (DOC) is an integral part of the City’s evolving criminal justice system, participating in reform initiatives and strategies aimed to move the City towards a smaller jail system without compromising public safety. The DOC is responsible for maintaining a safe and secure environment for our employees, visitors, volunteers, and people in our custody. Importantly, safe jails enable DOC to provide people in custody with the tools and opportunities they need to successfully re-enter their communities. The DOC operates facilities and court commands across the five boroughs with more than 7,500 diverse professionals and knowledgeable experts. The DOC seeks to recruit a highly motivated Human Resources Compliance Attorney to join the Human Resources Compliance Unit. The Human Resources Compliance Unit is responsible for investigating and adjudicating compliance matters for non-uniformed employees. This includes conducting background checks on non-uniformed prospective candidates for hire. Presenting Step I disciplinary cases to the Non-Uniform Disciplinary Committee for penalty recommendation. Conducting Step I disciplinary hearings as applied to non-uniformed employees. Tracking and enforcing New York City's Employees' Residency Requirements. Administering and monitoring federal compliance with the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) as applied to all agency staff. Duties of the Human Resources Compliance Attorney include: • Send weekly totals for Step I Hearings, Non-Uniform Disciplinary Committee, and onboarding cases for the Deputy Commissioner of Human Resources Review • Act as an agency liaison for the COIB Annual Financial Disclosure • Redact and analyze confidential discovery for accuracy • Draft various ad hoc memorandums for HR Compliance • Maintaining the unit calendar in outlook for all Step I Hearings, upcoming meetings for the unit and the Director of HR Compliance • Scheduling Step I Hearings, contacting members of service, union representatives and union attorneys regarding Step I Hearings • Send out Step I Hearing reminders to members of service and union representatives • Sending out discovery documents to Members of Service and Union Representative/Attorneys via USPS certified mail and electronically • Complete Closing Memos after Step I Hearings are conducted • Proofreading various documents which includes but is not limited to onboarding memos and Step I Determinations • Assist with preparation and managing presentation materials • Communicate and handle incoming and outgoing electronic communications and written correspondence • Maintain tracking mechanisms for data and document collection and storage • Perform employment verification investigations and draft investigation reports • Perform Step I Disciplinary Investigations and ad hoc investigations when needed • Perform general office functions and related duties as needed
Minimum qualifications
Graduation from an accredited United States law school as defined in the Rules of the New York Court of Appeals (Sections 520.3 or 520.5) or admission to the New York State Bar.
Preferred skills
• Must demonstrate the ability to follow directions, work independently and within a team. • Unwavering dedication to managing highly sensitive and confidential information. • Experience in handling multiple assignments with a high degree of detail and accuracy. • Excellent writing, communication, proofreading, inter-personal, analytical, research, problem-solving, and organizational skills. • MS Office (Word, Adobe, Excel, Outlook) proficiency.
Additional information
The City of New York offers a comprehensive benefits package including health insurance for the employee and his/her spouse or domestic partner and unemancipated children under age 26, union benefits such as dental and vision coverage, paid annual leave and sick leave, paid holidays, a pension, and optional savings and pre-tax programs such as Deferred Compensation, IRA, and a flexible spending account.
How to apply
For City employees: Go to Employee Self-Service (ESS) - www.nyc.gov/ess and search for Job ID#810529 For all other applicants: Go to https://a127-jobs.nyc.gov and search for Job ID#810529 Submission of a resume is not a guarantee that you will receive an interview. Only those candidates under consideration will be contacted.
Residency requirement
New York City residency is generally required within 90 days of appointment. However, City Employees in certain titles who have worked for the City for 2 continuous years may also be eligible to reside in Nassau, Suffolk, Putnam, Westchester, Rockland, or Orange County. To determine if the residency requirement applies to you, please discuss it with the agency representative at the time of interview.
Listing provenance
Where did this job come from?
See where this vacancy came from and whether more than one current source can still support it. Source names help with traceability and attribution; they are not endorsements or guarantees.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
- Continuity
- One recent renewable source
- Source-class independence
- One renewable source class
- Last source observation
- Observed very recently
This records when High Paid Job last observed the vacancy in source evidence. It confirms source presence, not that the employer edited the vacancy at that time.
- 1 enabled source recently observed this vacancy.
- At least one recent enabled source is a direct-employer, employer-authorized or official public source.
Source confidence is about traceability and continuity. It is separate from application safety and should not be read as an employer reputation rating.
This vacancy is supplied through an official public employment service. The source identifies where the listing was published; it is not an employer endorsement.
Listing source: Jobs NYC / NYC Open Data. Destination: a127-jobs.nyc.gov. The application opens in a new tab so you can keep this report open.