Job intelligence
Deputy Commissioner, Investigation & Intelligence
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Before relying on the listing: Confirm Work arrangement with the employer or source. See verification questions
Executive opportunity brief
The decision in one screen
A compact evidence-first read of compensation, flexibility, mobility and what still needs verification. No universal quality score is used.
Fast read
Opportunity DNA
There is a useful advantage here: the application route looks comparatively direct. Still, the salary benchmark is still shallow could change the fit.
The range is usable, but the comparable sample is still too shallow for a strong relative-pay call.
Country, timezone, payroll or office-attendance limits still need confirmation.
One or more material qualification requirements are stated and may narrow the realistic applicant pool.
Sponsorship and relocation support are not clear from the current listing.
The visible path is straightforward and no additional mandatory step is stated in the available listing text.
At least one recent enabled source can still renew this vacancy.
This fingerprint summarizes what is clear, constrained or still unanswered in the current listing. It is a reading aid, not an overall job score.
Decision evidence check
4 of 5 core facts stated
This checks whether the listing states the facts that commonly change an employment decision. It measures disclosure completeness, not whether the opportunity is good or bad.
Facts already stated
- Compensation
- Advertised location
- Application closing time
- Employment type
What to verify next
- Work arrangement: What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
Advertised location is not proof of work authorization, sponsorship, or legal eligibility. Unknown information is not a negative score; verify those questions separately.
Decision levers
What could make or break the fit?
Reasons to look closer
- The application route looks comparatively direct: The primary route points through an employer, an employer-authorized hiring source or an official employment source, and no extra mandatory step is stated in the listing text.
Trade-offs to weigh
- The salary benchmark is still shallow: Pay is disclosed, but the current comparison pool is too small for a strong relative-pay conclusion.
Questions worth asking before you invest more time
- Confirm which countries employees may work from and whether payroll-country, timezone or office-attendance restrictions apply.
- Confirm the actual minimum experience requirement rather than assuming preferred background is mandatory.
- Ask whether visa sponsorship is available before investing significant time in the application.
These questions come from details the listing leaves open. An unanswered point is not treated as a disadvantage.
Salary transparency context
Is pay disclosure typical for this kind of role?
This listing states usable structured compensation, but the current role sample is still too small for a reliable disclosure-rate comparison.
Compensation counts only when amount, ISO currency and supported pay period are all known.
At least ten current comparable roles are required before HPJ publishes a disclosure percentage.
Employer-level comparison is withheld until enough current employer listings are available.
This compares salary-disclosure behavior in current visible listings. It does not compare raw salary amounts across currencies, infer undisclosed pay as zero, or rate employer quality.
Private offer & negotiation lab
Turn an offer into evidence, not guesswork
Enter an annual base offer and, if you want, your own target. HPJ compares only within one explicit currency and never chooses a target for you.
Negotiation evidence available: advertised pay range, strong decision evidence.
Enter an annual base offer to compare it with explicit same-currency evidence. HPJ will not suggest a target for you.
Review the full package · 10 terms
Mark what is confirmed, what needs clarification and what you want to prioritize. These choices and notes stay in this browser.
Usable advertised compensation is available.
Variable compensation is mentioned; verify amount, formula, target and eligibility.
Equity or long-term incentive language is mentioned; verify grant type, vesting and valuation basis.
Retirement or pension benefits are mentioned; verify employer contribution and vesting.
Health-benefit language is mentioned; verify coverage, dependants and employee cost.
Paid-leave language is mentioned; verify the exact entitlement and carry-over rules.
The work arrangement is not established clearly enough.
Relocation support not established
Sponsorship not established
A review cycle is mentioned; verify timing and whether compensation can change at that review.
Questions worth taking into the offer conversation
- Is there a bonus, commission or other variable-pay component, and how is it calculated?
- Does the package include equity or another long-term incentive, and what are the vesting terms?
- What office attendance, travel or timezone-overlap expectations apply in practice?
- If relocation is relevant, what expenses, timing and repayment conditions are covered?
- What exact sponsorship or work-authorization conditions apply to this role?
- When is the first performance and compensation review after joining?
- What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
Skill bridge
What does this role connect to?
The available listing text does not contain enough recognized skill language for a useful skill bridge yet.
Application edge
- A degree requirement is stated. Verify the exact field, level and equivalency wording before treating your education as a match or mismatch.
Skill signals come from explicit text mentions. A mention is not automatically a requirement, and absence from the current top-skill list does not make a skill rare or unimportant.
Application Decision Lab
Turn the listing into a preparation plan
Separate what the listing actually states from what you still need to prepare or verify. Your selections and short notes stay in this browser and are never submitted to High Paid Job.
Degree requirement stated
The listing appears to state a degree as a required or mandatory qualification. Verify the exact field and equivalency rules in the authoritative application.
Questions worth resolving before you rely on the opportunity
- Work arrangement: What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
- Work authorization / sponsorship: If sponsorship or work authorization matters to you, what exact immigration or employer-sponsorship conditions apply to this role?
- Application process: What interview, assessment, portfolio, reference or screening stages are part of the hiring process?
- Degree equivalency: Is the stated degree requirement strict, or can directly relevant professional experience or another credential satisfy it?
Decision analysis
What the listing really tells you
Deputy Commissioner, Investigation & Intelligence at DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION becomes easier to judge once pay is visible, but the benchmark is still thin, the entry path is becoming clearer, and the visible application effort can be estimated are viewed together. Here is the current read from the information available.
Pay is visible, but the benchmark is still thin
A usable USD salary is available, but there are not enough comparable current observations for a strong percentile statement yet.
The entry path is becoming clearer
Degree requirement stated · 1 additional stated barrier. Only requirements actually stated in the listing are counted; anything left unsaid remains unresolved.
The visible application effort can be estimated
More direct application path. The external application may contain additional steps that are not visible from the listing itself.
The listing can be traced to a current source
The opportunity currently has 1 renewable source path across 1 source classes. Multiple independent paths can strengthen continuity, but they are not a substitute for checking the application destination.
How this analysis is assembled
This read combines the structured details currently available for pay, flexibility, qualifications, mobility, application effort and source continuity. Missing facts are left open for you to verify.
Analysis evidence coverage
How much analysis can the current evidence support?
This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
The available listing data is not clear enough to score location flexibility.
The configured source supplied structured salary fields, a usable currency and a focused comparison value.
The listing was posted about 7 days ago.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
There is no universal opportunity score because pay, flexibility and access matter differently to different people. Compare Jobs lets you weight the evidence around your own priorities.
Decision checklist
What is supported, uncertain or worth checking?
This checklist separates supported strengths, visible cautions and missing evidence. It is not an overall recommendation or guarantee that the job is suitable for you.
Supported strengths
- Recent provenance includes a comparatively direct source lane, improving traceability.
- The current provenance provides a comparatively direct application route.
Visible cautions
- Some compensation may be variable or performance-based. Confirm the guaranteed base amount before comparing headline pay.
- The description appears to mention an advanced degree requirement or preference.
- Degree requirement stated
Still unknown
- There is not enough comparable salary evidence to establish this job’s current pay position.
- The work-location policy is not clear enough for a Remote Freedom assessment.
- Visa sponsorship is not established by the available listing data.
Pay vs. barriers
Opportunity Efficiency not assessed
The current pay position is not reliable enough to weigh compensation against the stated barriers.
1 explicit required barrier is visible in the available wording.
- Current comparable pay position is unavailable.
- Required prior-experience level is not established.
- Work-location flexibility is not established strongly enough for Remote Freedom comparison.
This section weighs pay context against clearly stated barriers without collapsing unlike requirements into one universal score. Degree, experience, licensing, clearance and location limits remain separate, and missing qualification details stay unknown.
Beyond the headline
Not enough evidence for a hidden-value finding
Potential hidden value appears only when several distinct non-pay advantages are actually supported. Missing requirements or benefits are never counted as positives.
Still check: Degree requirement stated
Hidden Value is an experimental evidence summary, not an investment-style score or guarantee of employability. It only uses explicit current listing evidence and does not infer that an unmentioned qualification is unnecessary.
Compensation intelligence
How competitive is this pay?
This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
Why this analysis?
- This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
- Salary confidence: High. The configured source supplied structured salary fields, a usable currency and a focused comparison value.
- Range quality: Single disclosed value.
Employer compensation communication
Pay transparency at DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Very strong current pay transparency
This score uses the employer’s current visible listings and combines how often pay is disclosed with how useful those ranges are. Bonus, equity and benefit mentions are shown separately and do not raise the score.
This pattern comes from the employer’s current visible vacancies. It describes hiring and pay transparency in those listings, not employee satisfaction or a permanent judgement of the employer.
Current employer intelligence
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION — current opportunity snapshot
Employer Evidence Profile
How often this employer’s current visible sampled vacancies state decision-critical information. These percentages describe evidence coverage, not employer quality.
Current sampled listings with advertised compensation evidence.
Current sampled listings whose work arrangement is clearer than unknown.
Current sampled listings with a supported country signal.
Current sampled listings with an explicit closing time.
Current sampled listings with a usable posting date.
Current sampled listings that explicitly indicate confirmed, possible or unavailable sponsorship evidence.
Current sampled listings with an explicit relocation signal.
Low coverage means the current visible listings state the information less often. It does not prove that the employer lacks the policy, benefit or support.
Common current occupation families: Legal (2) · Data & AI (2) · Healthcare (2)
Visible seniority mix: Early-career (4) · Senior / lead (2)
Current employment-type mix: Full time (19) · Part time (4)
Most visible hiring countries in this sample: United States (23)
Other current roles from this employer
Assistant Commissioner- Training and Development
66-26 Metropolitan Ave., Queen
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearHR Compliance Attorney
75-20 Astoria Blvd
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearAssociate Commissioner of Operations
75-20 Astoria Blvd
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearCOOK
Rikers Island
Early-career · UnclearThese are other current vacancies visible from the same employer, not endorsements or evidence of future hiring plans.
Current disclosed salary medians by currency
- USD 75,805 median · 23 disclosed salaries
Questions worth asking this employer
- What work-arrangement and location expectations apply to this role in practice?
- If work authorization matters to you, what sponsorship policy applies to this specific role and location?
- If a move is required, is relocation assistance available for this position?
These questions are prompted by missing or thin evidence in the employer’s current visible vacancies. Missing evidence is not treated as a negative judgement.
This employer snapshot uses the employer’s current visible listings. Remote and sponsorship rates use only vacancies with explicit evidence, while missing information stays unknown. Salary medians are shown separately by currency and need at least five disclosed salaries. Zero confirmed sponsorship means none was explicitly found in this sample, not that sponsorship is unavailable.
This snapshot describes the employer’s current visible vacancies—things such as pay disclosure and work arrangement. It is not an employee-satisfaction or hiring-quality rating, and different currencies stay separate.
Work-location intelligence
Remote Freedom
Not enough work-location evidence
Why no score?
- The work-location policy is not clear enough to support a Remote Freedom score.
Remote Freedom measures observable location flexibility only. Unknown work-location information remains unscored. Timezone wording is penalized only when it appears restrictive; general collaboration across time zones is not treated as a restriction. A score does not guarantee legal work eligibility, payroll availability or visa sponsorship.
International applicant intelligence
Visa & relocation signals
Sponsorship status is shown only when the listing provides clear enough wording. Employer history or headquarters location is not used to guess an answer.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough sponsorship statement.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough relocation statement.
Tradeoff check
What’s the catch?
These are visible conditions worth checking before treating the headline compensation as the whole story:
- Some compensation may be variable or performance-based. Confirm the guaranteed base amount before comparing headline pay.
- The description appears to mention an advanced degree requirement or preference.
Application-path intelligence
What can we see about the application process?
More direct application path
The primary route is a direct-employer, employer-authorized hiring or official government source. That can reduce intermediary steps, although the external form may still be lengthy.
Current destination: cityjobs.nyc.gov · HTTPS
No additional required application step is clear in the available listing text. This does not mean the external application is one-click or friction-free.
Application effort is estimated from visible listing and source details. Optional steps are kept separate from mandatory ones, and the external form may contain additional requirements that are not visible here.
Application safety context
Application safety check
Basic application-safety context available
The current application destination has a basic transport-safety signal such as HTTPS. This does not verify the employer, vacancy, recruiter or application process.
Evidence checked: Source provenance · Application destination · Listing wording
Observable transport-safety signals
- The available application destination uses HTTPS.
Before you share money or sensitive information
- Confirm the vacancy on the employer’s official careers site when practical, especially if a recruiter contacts you outside the listed application path.
- Check that recruiter email domains and application destinations are consistent with the employer or an identifiable recruiting provider.
- Do not pay application, processing, training or equipment fees merely to be considered for a job.
- Do not send cryptocurrency, gift cards, online-banking credentials or PINs as part of an application.
- Treat unusually fast offers or interviews conducted only through informal messaging channels as reasons to verify the employer independently.
This is a limited safety screen, not employer verification and not a fraud determination. Never send money, cryptocurrency, passwords or sensitive banking credentials merely because a listing appears on a job platform.
Original listing details
The section below comes from the listing source. The decision sections above use the job’s structured pay, location, qualification, mobility and application details to give you additional context.
Job description
The New York City Department of Correction (DOC) is an integral part of the City’s evolving criminal justice system, participating in reform initiatives and strategies aimed to move the City towards a smaller jail system without compromising public safety. The DOC is responsible for maintaining a safe and secure environment for our employees, visitors, volunteers and people in our custody. Importantly, safe jails enable DOC to provide people in custody with the tools and opportunities they need to successfully re-enter their communities. The DOC operates facilities and court commands across the five boroughs with more than 7,500 diverse professionals and knowledgeable experts. The Investigations & Intelligence Division is the newly-integrated investigative branch of the DOC and reports through the Senior Deputy Commissioner of Investigations, Intelligence & Accountability (IIA) to the DOC’s Remediation Manager. The Division strives to prevent crime and other acts of misconduct within DOC’s jails, and investigates all allegations of staff misconduct and alleged wrongdoing by people in custody and visitors to DOC’s jails. Specifically, the Investigation Division (ID) is integral to the DOC’s efforts to ensure the integrity, professionalism, and accountability of its staff and is responsible for investigating acts of staff misconduct both on and off-duty; excessive use of force incidents, complaints and allegations; undue familiarity with people in custody; firearms regulation violations; erroneous discharges; escapes of people in custody; improper outside employment; and any other staff conduct deemed unbecoming as a member of the DOC or any staff actions that discredit the DOC. The Investigation Division works hand in hand with the New York City Department of Investigation to combat corruption within the DOC. The Investigation Division is also required, under the Nunez Consent Judgment, to adhere to deadlines ensuring timely and thorough investigations into Use of Force claims; the Division is scrutinized for compliance with these standards by a Federal Monitor. The Early Intervention Support & Supervision (EISS) unit falls within the Investigations & Intelligence Division. EISS seeks to identify and rehabilitate staff who have been involved in multiple acts of misconduct or demonstrate behavior that warrants redirection. The Correction Intelligence Bureau (CIB) proactively gathers intel from within the jails to interdict contraband, to guide facility managers regarding safe placement of individuals, and to investigate and prevent criminal activity within New York City jails. CIB investigators pursue the arrest of visitors or rearrest of people in custody who commit crimes in DOC facilities. CIB staff collect and test evidence, support the District Attorneys Offices in their pursuit of criminal convictions for crimes committed in DOC’s jails, and routinely liaise with external local, state and federal agencies to assist with highly confidential operations. Under executive direction of the Senior Deputy Commissioner of Investigations, Intelligence & Accountability, and with the broadest possible latitude to exercise independent judgment, the Deputy Commissioner of Investigations & Intelligence will assist the Senior Deputy Commissioner with leading the Investigations Division, EISS, and CIB. They will be responsible for managing and supervising all facets of investigations, making recommendations and determinations on the hiring and promotion of investigative staff, directing investigator training, setting strategic direction for the divisions, performing related duties as requested, and serving as partner to DOC’s Deputy Commissioner of Accountability.
Minimum qualifications
1. A Master’s Degree from an accredited college in Public Administration, Personnel Administration, Business Administration, Human Services, Criminal Justice, Political Science, Psychology or an equivalent/related field, plus five years of satisfactory experience of a nature to qualify for the duties and responsibilities of the position, at least 18 months of which must have been in an administrative, managerial, or executive capacity or supervising personnel performing activities related to the duties of the position; or 2. A baccalaureate degree from an accredited college with a major in Public Administration, Personnel Administration, Business Administration, Finance, Human Services, Criminal Justice, Political Science, Psychology or an equivalent/related field, plus seven years of satisfactory experience of a nature to qualify for the duties and responsibilities of the position, at least 18 months of which must have been in an administrative, managerial, or executive capacity or supervising personnel performing activities related to the duties of the position. 3. A four-year high school diploma or its educational equivalent and eleven years of satisfactory, full-time progressively responsible experience as described in "1" above, 18 months of which must have been in an administrative, managerial, executive or supervisory capacity.
Preferred skills
A minimum of ten (10) years of investigative/law enforcement experience and knowledge of the New York City/New York State criminal justice system; Extensive experience conducting and overseeing investigations; Excellent writing, communication, inter-personal, analytical, research, problem-solving, multi-tasking and organizational skills; Ability to maintain and handle confidential documents and information; Ability to interact with and understand the work of other city agencies, including Department of Investigations, New York Police Department, and District Attorney’s offices; Ability to work strategically and collaboratively with inter-departmental units; Ability to communicate highly complex information clearly and succinctly, both orally and in writing; Ability to work under intense pressure and meet restrictive deadlines.
Additional information
The City of New York offers a comprehensive benefits package including health insurance for the employee and his/her spouse or domestic partner and unemancipated children under age 26, union benefits such as dental and vision coverage, paid annual leave and sick leave, paid holidays, a pension, and optional savings and pre-tax programs such as Deferred Compensation, IRA, and a flexible spending account.
How to apply
For City employees: Go to Employee Self-Service (ESS) - www.nyc.gov/ess. Click on Recruiting Activities > Careers and search for Job ID#809707. For all other applicants: Go to www.nyc.gov/careers/search and search for Job ID#809707. Submission of a resume is not a guarantee that you will receive an interview. Only those candidates under consideration will be contacted.
Residency requirement
New York City residency is generally required within 90 days of appointment. However, City Employees in certain titles who have worked for the City for 2 continuous years may also be eligible to reside in Nassau, Suffolk, Putnam, Westchester, Rockland, or Orange County. To determine if the residency requirement applies to you, please discuss with the agency representative at the time of interview.
Listing provenance
Where did this job come from?
See where this vacancy came from and whether more than one current source can still support it. Source names help with traceability and attribution; they are not endorsements or guarantees.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
- Continuity
- One recent renewable source
- Source-class independence
- One renewable source class
- Last source observation
- Observed very recently
This records when High Paid Job last observed the vacancy in source evidence. It confirms source presence, not that the employer edited the vacancy at that time.
- 1 enabled source recently observed this vacancy.
- At least one recent enabled source is a direct-employer, employer-authorized or official public source.
Source confidence is about traceability and continuity. It is separate from application safety and should not be read as an employer reputation rating.
This vacancy is supplied through an official public employment service. The source identifies where the listing was published; it is not an employer endorsement.
Listing source: Jobs NYC / NYC Open Data. Destination: cityjobs.nyc.gov. The application opens in a new tab so you can keep this report open.
