Job intelligence
Assistant Commissioner- Training and Development
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Before relying on the listing: Confirm Work arrangement with the employer or source. See verification questions
Executive opportunity brief
The decision in one screen
A compact evidence-first read of compensation, flexibility, mobility and what still needs verification. No universal quality score is used.
Fast read
Opportunity DNA
The available details do not point to a single standout advantage yet. The clearest issue to weigh is the salary benchmark is still shallow.
The range is usable, but the comparable sample is still too shallow for a strong relative-pay call.
Country, timezone, payroll or office-attendance limits still need confirmation.
The listing does not make the minimum education or experience threshold clear enough yet.
Sponsorship and relocation support are not clear from the current listing.
Part of the application route can be assessed, but the full external process may contain additional steps.
At least one recent enabled source can still renew this vacancy.
This fingerprint summarizes what is clear, constrained or still unanswered in the current listing. It is a reading aid, not an overall job score.
Decision evidence check
4 of 5 core facts stated
This checks whether the listing states the facts that commonly change an employment decision. It measures disclosure completeness, not whether the opportunity is good or bad.
Facts already stated
- Compensation
- Advertised location
- Application closing time
- Employment type
What to verify next
- Work arrangement: What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
Advertised location is not proof of work authorization, sponsorship, or legal eligibility. Unknown information is not a negative score; verify those questions separately.
Decision levers
What could make or break the fit?
Reasons to look closer
Nothing stands out strongly enough yet to call a clear advantage. The role may still be attractive for reasons the listing does not spell out.
Trade-offs to weigh
- The salary benchmark is still shallow: Pay is disclosed, but the current comparison pool is too small for a strong relative-pay conclusion.
Questions worth asking before you invest more time
- Confirm which countries employees may work from and whether payroll-country, timezone or office-attendance restrictions apply.
- Confirm whether a degree is actually required, preferred, or replaceable with equivalent experience.
- Confirm the actual minimum experience requirement rather than assuming preferred background is mandatory.
- Ask whether visa sponsorship is available before investing significant time in the application.
These questions come from details the listing leaves open. An unanswered point is not treated as a disadvantage.
Salary transparency context
Is pay disclosure typical for this kind of role?
This listing states usable structured compensation, but the current role sample is still too small for a reliable disclosure-rate comparison.
Compensation counts only when amount, ISO currency and supported pay period are all known.
At least ten current comparable roles are required before HPJ publishes a disclosure percentage.
Employer-level comparison is withheld until enough current employer listings are available.
This compares salary-disclosure behavior in current visible listings. It does not compare raw salary amounts across currencies, infer undisclosed pay as zero, or rate employer quality.
Private offer & negotiation lab
Turn an offer into evidence, not guesswork
Enter an annual base offer and, if you want, your own target. HPJ compares only within one explicit currency and never chooses a target for you.
Negotiation evidence available: advertised pay range, strong decision evidence.
Enter an annual base offer to compare it with explicit same-currency evidence. HPJ will not suggest a target for you.
Review the full package · 10 terms
Mark what is confirmed, what needs clarification and what you want to prioritize. These choices and notes stay in this browser.
Usable advertised compensation is available.
Variable compensation is mentioned; verify amount, formula, target and eligibility.
Equity or long-term incentive language is mentioned; verify grant type, vesting and valuation basis.
Retirement or pension benefits are mentioned; verify employer contribution and vesting.
Health-benefit language is mentioned; verify coverage, dependants and employee cost.
Paid-leave language is mentioned; verify the exact entitlement and carry-over rules.
The work arrangement is not established clearly enough.
Relocation support not established
Sponsorship not established
A review cycle is mentioned; verify timing and whether compensation can change at that review.
Questions worth taking into the offer conversation
- Is there a bonus, commission or other variable-pay component, and how is it calculated?
- Does the package include equity or another long-term incentive, and what are the vesting terms?
- What retirement or pension contribution does the employer provide?
- How much paid leave is provided and what are the carry-over or blackout rules?
- What office attendance, travel or timezone-overlap expectations apply in practice?
- If relocation is relevant, what expenses, timing and repayment conditions are covered?
- What exact sponsorship or work-authorization conditions apply to this role?
- When is the first performance and compensation review after joining?
Skill bridge
What does this role connect to?
The listing contains useful skill signals, while the current occupation sample is still too thin for a broader comparison.
Skills named in this listing
Shared with the current career sample
The occupation sample is still too thin for a reliable shared-skill comparison.
Application edge
- If these skills match your background, prepare one concrete example that shows how you used Procurement rather than relying on a keyword-only claim.
- The listing mentions extra application steps. Review those requirements before starting so you can prepare the requested material in one pass.
Skill signals come from explicit text mentions. A mention is not automatically a requirement, and absence from the current top-skill list does not make a skill rare or unimportant.
Application Decision Lab
Turn the listing into a preparation plan
Separate what the listing actually states from what you still need to prepare or verify. Your selections and short notes stay in this browser and are never submitted to High Paid Job.
Procurement
This skill or technology is explicitly mentioned in the available listing text. A mention is not automatically a mandatory requirement; prepare a concrete example only if it is relevant to your experience.
Prepare for a stated application step
An assessment, test or work-sample step is explicitly mentioned.
Questions worth resolving before you rely on the opportunity
- Work arrangement: What is the expected on-site, hybrid or remote schedule, including any fixed office-attendance or timezone-overlap requirement?
- Work authorization / sponsorship: If sponsorship or work authorization matters to you, what exact immigration or employer-sponsorship conditions apply to this role?
Decision analysis
What the listing really tells you
The headline alone does not tell the whole story for Assistant Commissioner- Training and Development at DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION. The clearest decision context comes from the range is useful even though the comparison pool is small, the visible application effort can be estimated, and the listing can be traced to a current source.
The range is useful even though the comparison pool is small
A usable USD salary is available, but there are not enough comparable current observations for a strong percentile statement yet.
The visible application effort can be estimated
More direct application path · 1 visible process step. The external application may contain additional steps that are not visible from the listing itself.
The listing can be traced to a current source
1 recent enabled source can currently renew this vacancy across 1 source classes. That improves traceability, although it does not verify the employer itself.
How this analysis is assembled
The brief pulls together the parts of the vacancy that can be compared reliably today. Gaps in the listing remain visible instead of being filled with assumptions.
Analysis evidence coverage
How much analysis can the current evidence support?
This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
The available listing data is not clear enough to score location flexibility.
The configured source supplied structured salary fields, a usable currency and a focused comparison value.
The listing was posted about 2 days ago.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
There is no universal opportunity score because pay, flexibility and access matter differently to different people. Compare Jobs lets you weight the evidence around your own priorities.
Decision checklist
What is supported, uncertain or worth checking?
This checklist separates supported strengths, visible cautions and missing evidence. It is not an overall recommendation or guarantee that the job is suitable for you.
Supported strengths
- Recent provenance includes a comparatively direct source lane, improving traceability.
- The current provenance provides a comparatively direct application route.
Visible cautions
- Some compensation may be variable or performance-based. Confirm the guaranteed base amount before comparing headline pay.
- The description appears to mention an advanced degree requirement or preference.
Still unknown
- There is not enough comparable salary evidence to establish this job’s current pay position.
- The work-location policy is not clear enough for a Remote Freedom assessment.
- Visa sponsorship is not established by the available listing data.
Pay vs. barriers
Opportunity Efficiency not assessed
The current pay position is not reliable enough to weigh compensation against the stated barriers.
- Current comparable pay position is unavailable.
- Education requirement is not established.
- Required prior-experience level is not established.
- Work-location flexibility is not established strongly enough for Remote Freedom comparison.
This section weighs pay context against clearly stated barriers without collapsing unlike requirements into one universal score. Degree, experience, licensing, clearance and location limits remain separate, and missing qualification details stay unknown.
Beyond the headline
Not enough evidence for a hidden-value finding
Potential hidden value appears only when several distinct non-pay advantages are actually supported. Missing requirements or benefits are never counted as positives.
Hidden Value is an experimental evidence summary, not an investment-style score or guarantee of employability. It only uses explicit current listing evidence and does not infer that an unmentioned qualification is unnecessary.
Compensation intelligence
How competitive is this pay?
This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
Why this analysis?
- This title does not yet fit a reliable comparison family, so a pay percentile is not shown.
- Salary confidence: High. The configured source supplied structured salary fields, a usable currency and a focused comparison value.
- Range quality: Single disclosed value.
Employer compensation communication
Pay transparency at DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Very strong current pay transparency
This score uses the employer’s current visible listings and combines how often pay is disclosed with how useful those ranges are. Bonus, equity and benefit mentions are shown separately and do not raise the score.
This pattern comes from the employer’s current visible vacancies. It describes hiring and pay transparency in those listings, not employee satisfaction or a permanent judgement of the employer.
Current employer intelligence
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION — current opportunity snapshot
Employer Evidence Profile
How often this employer’s current visible sampled vacancies state decision-critical information. These percentages describe evidence coverage, not employer quality.
Current sampled listings with advertised compensation evidence.
Current sampled listings whose work arrangement is clearer than unknown.
Current sampled listings with a supported country signal.
Current sampled listings with an explicit closing time.
Current sampled listings with a usable posting date.
Current sampled listings that explicitly indicate confirmed, possible or unavailable sponsorship evidence.
Current sampled listings with an explicit relocation signal.
Low coverage means the current visible listings state the information less often. It does not prove that the employer lacks the policy, benefit or support.
Common current occupation families: Legal (2) · Data & AI (2) · Healthcare (2)
Visible seniority mix: Early-career (4) · Senior / lead (2)
Current employment-type mix: Full time (19) · Part time (4)
Most visible hiring countries in this sample: United States (23)
Other current roles from this employer
HR Compliance Attorney
75-20 Astoria Blvd
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearAssociate Commissioner of Operations
75-20 Astoria Blvd
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearCOOK
Rikers Island
Early-career · UnclearDeputy Commissioner, Investigation & Intelligence
75-20 Astoria Blvd
Seniority not clearly specified · UnclearThese are other current vacancies visible from the same employer, not endorsements or evidence of future hiring plans.
Current disclosed salary medians by currency
- USD 75,805 median · 23 disclosed salaries
Questions worth asking this employer
- What work-arrangement and location expectations apply to this role in practice?
- If work authorization matters to you, what sponsorship policy applies to this specific role and location?
- If a move is required, is relocation assistance available for this position?
These questions are prompted by missing or thin evidence in the employer’s current visible vacancies. Missing evidence is not treated as a negative judgement.
This employer snapshot uses the employer’s current visible listings. Remote and sponsorship rates use only vacancies with explicit evidence, while missing information stays unknown. Salary medians are shown separately by currency and need at least five disclosed salaries. Zero confirmed sponsorship means none was explicitly found in this sample, not that sponsorship is unavailable.
This snapshot describes the employer’s current visible vacancies—things such as pay disclosure and work arrangement. It is not an employee-satisfaction or hiring-quality rating, and different currencies stay separate.
Work-location intelligence
Remote Freedom
Not enough work-location evidence
Why no score?
- The work-location policy is not clear enough to support a Remote Freedom score.
Remote Freedom measures observable location flexibility only. Unknown work-location information remains unscored. Timezone wording is penalized only when it appears restrictive; general collaboration across time zones is not treated as a restriction. A score does not guarantee legal work eligibility, payroll availability or visa sponsorship.
International applicant intelligence
Visa & relocation signals
Sponsorship status is shown only when the listing provides clear enough wording. Employer history or headquarters location is not used to guess an answer.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough sponsorship statement.
The available listing details do not contain a clear enough relocation statement.
Tradeoff check
What’s the catch?
These are visible conditions worth checking before treating the headline compensation as the whole story:
- Some compensation may be variable or performance-based. Confirm the guaranteed base amount before comparing headline pay.
- The description appears to mention an advanced degree requirement or preference.
Application-path intelligence
What can we see about the application process?
More direct application path
The primary route is a direct-employer, employer-authorized hiring or official government source. That can reduce intermediary steps, although the external form may still be lengthy.
Current destination: a127-jobs.nyc.gov · HTTPS
Visible application steps or requirements
- An assessment, test or work-sample step is explicitly mentioned.
Application effort is estimated from visible listing and source details. Optional steps are kept separate from mandatory ones, and the external form may contain additional requirements that are not visible here.
Application safety context
Application safety check
Basic application-safety context available
The current application destination has a basic transport-safety signal such as HTTPS. This does not verify the employer, vacancy, recruiter or application process.
Evidence checked: Source provenance · Application destination · Listing wording
Observable transport-safety signals
- The available application destination uses HTTPS.
Before you share money or sensitive information
- Confirm the vacancy on the employer’s official careers site when practical, especially if a recruiter contacts you outside the listed application path.
- Check that recruiter email domains and application destinations are consistent with the employer or an identifiable recruiting provider.
- Do not pay application, processing, training or equipment fees merely to be considered for a job.
- Do not send cryptocurrency, gift cards, online-banking credentials or PINs as part of an application.
- Treat unusually fast offers or interviews conducted only through informal messaging channels as reasons to verify the employer independently.
This is a limited safety screen, not employer verification and not a fraud determination. Never send money, cryptocurrency, passwords or sensitive banking credentials merely because a listing appears on a job platform.
Original listing details
The section below comes from the listing source. The decision sections above use the job’s structured pay, location, qualification, mobility and application details to give you additional context.
Job description
The New York City Department of Correction (DOC) is an integral part of the City’s evolving criminal justice system, participating in reform initiatives and strategies aimed at moving the city towards a smaller jail system without compromising public safety. The DOC is responsible for maintaining a safe and secure environment for our employees, visitors, volunteers, and people in our custody. Importantly, safe jails enable DOC to provide people in custody with the tools and opportunities they need to successfully re-enter their communities. The DOC operates facilities and court commands across the five boroughs with more than 7,500 diverse professionals and knowledgeable experts. Under the executive direction of the Deputy Commissioner for Training and Development, the Assistant Commissioner for Training and Development serves as a senior executive responsible for the administration, coordination, and operational oversight of the New York City Department of Correction’s comprehensive training, workforce development, and professional development programs. The Assistant Commissioner supports the Deputy Commissioner in implementing the strategic vision of the Training and Development Division (TDD) by establishing measurable operational objectives, strengthening supervisory structures, and ensuring the effective execution of training initiatives across the Department. This position provides executive-level leadership and coordination among academy administrators, managers, supervisors, instructors, and support personnel to ensure training programs remain operationally relevant, instructionally effective, compliant with applicable laws and regulations, and responsive to the Department’s evolving needs. Through strategic resource management, continuous program evaluation, and the implementation of performance improvements, the Assistant Commissioner promotes workforce readiness, instructional excellence, leadership development, institutional safety, accountability, and measurable improvements in employee performance, ultimately supporting the Department’s mission of maintaining safe, secure, professional, and effective correctional operations. Strategic Leadership and Organizational Management · Implement and monitor training strategy, operational plans, performance measures, staffing needs, timelines, and accountability. · Align near- and long-term priorities with operations, workforce needs, reforms, risks, and public-safety practices; represent TDD as assigned. · Establish short-, intermediate-, and long-term priorities aligned with Department operations, workforce needs, reform requirements, identified organizational risks, and recognized correctional and public-safety practices Academy, Recruit, Field, and In-Service Training · Oversee Recruit Academy, Field Training Unit, in-service training, and assigned programs. · Ensure adequate staff, supervision, scheduling, facilities, equipment, assessments, remediation, safety, and quality controls. · Integrate classroom and field training through practical scenarios, coaching, competency assessments, and curricula aligned with policy and legal requirements. Leadership and Professional Development · Oversee supervisory, pre-promotional, mentoring, coaching, and leadership development for uniformed and civilian personnel. · Build role-specific supervisory, administrative, interpersonal, decision-making, and operational skills; support succession planning. Facility-Based Training and Performance Improvement · Analyze incidents, reviews, audits, investigations, corrective actions, observations, and performance data to identify skill and supervisory gaps. · Coordinate targeted training, coaching, and remediation with facility leadership; incorporate operational lessons into instruction. Training Compliance, Analytics, and Quality Assurance · Develop and monitor LMS data, training records, dashboards, completion rates, competency measures, and operational trends to identify gaps and risks. · Evaluate learning and field application through assessments, practical testing, and supervisor observations; recommend corrective action. Curriculum and Instructor Development · Establish standards for curriculum design, delivery, testing, evaluation, and revision consistent with policy, law, adult learning, and operational needs reflecting current Department policies · Oversee instructor selection, certification, development, evaluation, and deployment, including Instructor and Master Instructor Development programs. Emergency Preparedness and Operational Readiness · Integrate incident command, fire and life safety, active threats, medical response, continuity, and critical-incident readiness into training. · Coordinate drills, simulations, tabletop exercises, after-action reviews, and joint training with relevant partners. Personnel, Budget, and Resource Management · Direct, supervise and evaluate uniformed and civilian leaders, instructors, analysts, administrative staff, and support personnel. · Assess staffing requirements, assignments, organizational structure, and succession needs; assist with budgets, contracts, procurement, technology, facilities, and equipment. · Identify resource constraints affecting safety, capacity, compliance, quality, and readiness; recommend solutions. Partnerships and Organizational Improvement · Build relationships with educational, government, correctional, law-enforcement, research, and professional partners. · Pursue executive education, credentials, research, technical assistance, grants, and collaboration supporting reform, safety, accountability, and performance. Required Knowledge, Skills, and Competencies · Demonstrated strategic and instructional leadership; · Multi-program, personnel, facility, project, and resource management. · Adult learning, curriculum design, scenario-based instruction, competency assessment, coaching, mentoring, leadership development, compliance, emergency preparedness, and performance improve
Minimum qualifications
· Demonstrated strategic and instructional leadership; · Multi-program, personnel, facility, project, and resource management. · Adult learning, curriculum design, scenario-based instruction, competency assessment, coaching, mentoring, leadership development, compliance, emergency preparedness, and performance improvement. · Data analysis, risk assessment, problem-solving, change leadership, collaboration, accountability, and executive-level written and oral communication with internal and external stakeholders.
Preferred skills
· A master’s degree in Public Administration, Human Resources, Education, Organizational Leadership, Criminal Justice, Emergency Management, Business Administration, Personnel Administration, Psychology, Human Services, or a closely related field. · A minimum of five (5) years of progressively responsible professional experience in a relevant field, including substantial leadership, management, or supervisory responsibilities. An equivalent combination of education and experience may be considered, consistent with applicable requirements. · Demonstrated experience in instructional leadership, academy administration, or training program management within a public safety, law enforcement, correctional, or comparable government environment. · Proven ability to develop, implement, deliver, supervise, and evaluate comprehensive training programs that support operational readiness, workforce development, and employee performance. · Strong knowledge of public safety training operations, instructional methodologies, curriculum development, regulatory compliance, and the application of training to field operations. · Experience overseeing training personnel, instructors, supervisors, and multidisciplinary teams, with an emphasis on instructional quality, operational effectiveness, and accountability. · Demonstrated ability to assess training effectiveness, identify performance deficiencies, and implement improvements that strengthen employee competency, institutional safety, and organizational performance.
How to apply
For City employees: Go to Employee Self-Service (ESS) - www.nyc.gov/ess and search for Job ID# 810466. For all other applicants: Go to https://a127-jobs.nyc.gov and search for Job ID# 810466. Submission of a resume is not a guarantee that you will receive an interview. Only those candidates under consideration will be contacted.
Residency requirement
New York City residency is generally required within 90 days of appointment. However, City Employees in certain titles who have worked for the City for 2 continuous years may also be eligible to reside in Nassau, Suffolk, Putnam, Westchester, Rockland, or Orange County. To determine if the residency requirement applies to you, please discuss with the agency representative at the time of interview.
Listing provenance
Where did this job come from?
See where this vacancy came from and whether more than one current source can still support it. Source names help with traceability and attribution; they are not endorsements or guarantees.
The vacancy has recent enabled provenance through a comparatively direct source lane. This strengthens traceability, not employer verification.
- Continuity
- One recent renewable source
- Source-class independence
- One renewable source class
- Last source observation
- Observed very recently
This records when High Paid Job last observed the vacancy in source evidence. It confirms source presence, not that the employer edited the vacancy at that time.
- 1 enabled source recently observed this vacancy.
- At least one recent enabled source is a direct-employer, employer-authorized or official public source.
Source confidence is about traceability and continuity. It is separate from application safety and should not be read as an employer reputation rating.
This vacancy is supplied through an official public employment service. The source identifies where the listing was published; it is not an employer endorsement.
Listing source: Jobs NYC / NYC Open Data. Destination: a127-jobs.nyc.gov. The application opens in a new tab so you can keep this report open.
